apotex september 2008

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

250 documents for apotex september 2008

- ELI LILLY AND COMPANY AND ELI LILLY CANADA INC. c. APOTEX INC. AND BETWEEN: APOTEX INC. c. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY AND ELI LILLY CANADA INC. AND SHIONOGI & CO. LTD., 2011 FC 1143 (2011)
... fees would be before and after the April 4, 2008 settlement offer discussed later on, under various... Counterclaim was scheduled to start on September 2, 2008. [20] For Apotex, none of the offers made ...
- Cour Fédérale
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Apotex inc., 2009 FC 991 (2009)
...,547 (“the ‘547 Patent”), issued September 28, 1982, expired September 28, 1999;. c. Canadian...This was provided by Apotex on May 12, 2008. Inconsistencies were also identified with regards...
- Federal Court
- ELI LILLY AND COMPANY AND ELI LILLY CANADA INC. v APOTEX INC. AND BETWEEN: APOTEX INC. v ELI LILLY AND COMPANY AND ELI LILLY CANADA INC. AND SHIONOGI & CO. LTD., 2011 FC 1143 (2011)
... fees would be before and after the April 4, 2008 settlement offer discussed later on, under various... Counterclaim was scheduled to start on September 2, 2008. [20] For Apotex, none of the offers made ...
- Federal Court

- A shift in the Canadian law of obviousness: a comment on Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc.
Abstract . The Supreme Court of Canada's 2008 decision in Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc. v. Apote...: Challenges and Priorities, 23 September 2002), online: (at $15 billion per year, pharmac...
- University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review
- Vol. 67 Nbr. 2, March 2009
- Shire Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2011 FCA 10 (2011)
... was dismissed by Justice Hughes on April 25, 2008 (2008 FC 538). A notice of compliance was issued t... version of Alertec was delayed from September 1, 2006 to April 25, 2008. The motion before me re...
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Apotex Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., 2009 FC 378 (2009)
... Order of Prothonotary Lafrenière dated September 23, 2008 which, in the case of the Plaintiff Apote...
- Federal Court
- Apotex Inc. v. Canada (Health), 2011 FC 1308 (2011)
... a revocation by the Minister on December 5, 2008 of an “approvability status” for its Apo-Omepr...Sherman’s affidavit sworn on September 8, 2010 relates a two decade history of “apparen...
- Federal Court
- Apotex Inc. c. Warner-Lambert Company LLC, 2012 FC 202 (2012)
... Defendants were dismissed at trial, in September 2005 , but that decision was reversed by the Feder..., 2008 FCA 88 ( Hässle ) where Justice Sexton stated: �...
- Cour Fédérale
- Apotex Inc. c. Canada (Health), 2011 FC 1308 (2011)
... a revocation by the Minister on December 5, 2008 of an “approvability status” for its Apo-Omepr...Sherman’s affidavit sworn on September 8, 2010 relates a two decade history of “apparen...
- Cour Fédérale
- Apotex Inc. c. Shire Canada Inc., 2011 FC 436 (2011)
... was dismissed by this Court on April 25, 2008, the Court finding that Apotex’s allegations of ... case management conference was held on September 16, 2009, in the course of which a schedule for al...
- Cour Fédérale