What [Frances Russell] is saying is that almost every journalist and "media," which I assume refers to management and proprietorship, knew that a scandal existed with respect to the claims made by [Schreiber], and deliberately acted to ignore and or defeat reporting on the story. She suggests this is part of some kind of right-wing media conspiracy. Her evidence is as follows: A quick scan of the data base of CanWest newspapers reveals that on Oct. 9, 2004, the Edmonton Journal reported on [William Kaplan]'s book under the headline [Brian Mulroney] took Schreiber cash, book says. On Nov. 5, 2004, under the headline The scandal that won't go away in the National Post, Michael Bliss published a 900-word review of the Kaplan book. Most notably, however, in response to Russell's conspiracy ...
Nelson, during a news conference Friday from Roseau River First Nation's VLT facility on Highway 6 just north of the Perimeter Highway, repeated claims made earlier in the week that the contents of the auditor's report -- and its release seven days before elections for chief and council -- were meant to undermine his chances of re-election as chief in Monday's election.
There have always been two versions of 9/11 conspiracy theory. The lesser version held that the [George W. Bush] administration had advance intelligence of al-Qaida's plans, but chose to ignore the warning because the attacks suited its purposes. The greater version insisted that there was no I don't believe that happened because I don't think that Tenet, Rice, Powell et al. would have deliberately plotted the deaths of thousands of Americans. I don't believe even [Dick Cheney] would have done that. And I note that there has been no inexplicable wave of sudden deaths among junior intelligence analysts in Washington. More than five years later, not one of them has talked. Nobody has got drunk and spilled their guts. Nobody has told their spouse, who then blabbed. Not one of these 10,000 ...
Over the years, the letters have become e-mails. Sometimes they're from regular Downs handicappers and sometimes they're from people claiming special "inside knowledge of what's REALLY GOING ON at the track. [Trevor Dove] flatly denies the allegations, as does at least one of the riders. But if it's true, it's damning because the rules allow for jockeys to bet on their own horses, just as long as it's only to win and as long as a horse's owner or trainer lays the bet. So when you get right down to it, races at the Downs and other North American tracks aren't being fixed, but it's not because someone wouldn't like to do so -- it's because no one's smart enough to put it altogether.
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex Canada
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other interesting searches:
dictatorship in africa | finance house base rate | motion de censure constructive | development regions nepal | apec countries involved | Fast Track Systems, Inc. | Ahmed Qurei | DigiLava, Inc | Fleurus Presse | poitou-charentes food
