cross-examination debate

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

357 documents for cross-examination debate

- Eli Lilly and Company v. Apotex inc., 2009 FC 991 (2009)
... number of issues involved or to focus the debate at trial. [7] Given the amount of evidence filed a...
- Federal Court
- R. v. Pires; R. v. Lising, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343, 2005 SCC 66, 2005 SCC 66 (2005)
...24 There is no debate that these important principles are relevant both ...
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Science in the courtroom: the mouse that roared.
... ideological witnesses who may deflect the debate from the real issues; . (e) cross-examination whic...
- University of New Brunswick Law Journal
- Nbr. 56, January 2007

- R. v. Khelawon, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 787, 2006 SCC 57, 2006 SCC 57 (2006)
...35). In U. (F.J.), there was a similar debate over whether the "B. (K.G.) exception" to the rule...
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Ratiopharm Inc. v. Canada (Santé), 2007 CAF 83 (2007)
... statement) is the document that frames the debate in a subsequent prohibition proceeding, and that a...
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Merck-Frosst v. Canada (Health), 2009 FC 914 (2009)
... law when she held that “engaging in a debate, critique, argument, rebuttal or disagreement is n...
- Federal Court
- Year in review: developments in Canadian law in 2008.
... VI BUSINESS LAW The Stakeholders Debate i. Derivative Actions ii. The Oppression Remedy ii...
- University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review
- Vol. 67 Nbr. 2, March 2009
- R. v. National Post , 2010 SCC 16 ; [2010] 1 S.C.R. 477, R. v. National Post, 2010 SCC 16, 2010 SCC 16 (2010)
... otherwise dry-up, freedom of expression in debate on matters of public interest would be badly compr...
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Ratiopharm Inc. v. Canada (Health), 2007 FCA 83 (2007)
... statement) is the document that frames the debate in a subsequent prohibition proceeding, and that a...
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Pfizer Canada Inc. c. Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC, 2011 FC 547 (2011)
... occur before June 21, 1988? After much debate, it was agreed that the FDAs investigation of th...
- Cour Fédérale