Regulating administrative monopoly is the major task of China's "anti-monopoly law" and the greatest challenge in its enforcement. "Anti-monopoly law" has done a special chapter on administrative monopoly for the first time, which is a significant breakthrough of our country's legislation on the regulation of administrative monopoly. But, after all, "anti-monopoly law" is a new law, and due to the limitations of legislation, there are many system deficiencies, on the regulation of administrative monopoly in China's "Anti-monopoly law", which make it can not fully come into play. So, it is necessary to perfect the measures that can make up for the system deficiencies.
This article explores the experiences of clients inside the Collaborative Law process. Analyzing the results of a pilot study, the authors discuss the degree to which clients were meaningfully engaged in the process, and identify reported imbalances in power as one of the most significant barriers to client engagement. Clients' reflections also help to identify the degree to which Collaborative Law's unique features either overcame or exacerbated significant imbalances. While lawyers had considerable influence over how the process was experienced, what clients brought to the table also appeared influential, leading the authors to conclude that more attention must be paid to screening.
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex Canada
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other interesting searches:
communism vs socialism | diplomacy | lobbyistes bruxelles | intégration européenne et développement des échanges | testing 123 | catalysis | Cadbury India | Gail Marcinkiewicz | Benicorp Insurance Company | adderley vs florida
