-
Case Law
Federal Court - June 02, 2008
Yousif v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1998)
Date: 19980723 Docket: IMM-2511-98 BETWEEN: ESHO YOUSIF Applicant - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR TEITELBAUM J.: [1]...... The Respondent's [9] The respondent submits that ...
-
Case Law
Supreme Court of Canada - April 10, 2008
McKee v. McKee, [1950] S.C.R. 700 (1950)
Supreme Court of Canada McKee v. McKee, [1950] S.C.R. 700 Date: 1950-06-06 Evelyn McKee (Plaintiff) Appellant; and Mark T. McKee (Defendant) Respondent. 1950: March 15, 16, 17, 20, 21; 1950: June 6. ...
-
Case Law
Supreme Court of Canada - June 25, 2008
Côté v. R., [1975] S.C.R. 303 (1974)
Supreme Court of Canada Côté v. R., [1975] S.C.R. 303 Date: 1974-04-02 Louis Côté Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. 1972: October 26; 1974: April 2. Present: ...... In the result these were two separate offences. Per Laskin J. ...
-
Case Law
Supreme Court of Canada - June 26, 2008
Côté v. R., [1975] 1 S.C.R. 303 (1974)
Supreme Court of Canada Côté v. R., [1975] 1 S.C.R. 303 Date: 1974-04-02 Louis Côté Appellant; and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent. 1972: October 26; 1974: April 2. Present: ...... In the result these were two separate offences. Per Laskin J. ...
-
Case Law
Federal Court - June 04, 2008
Sanofi-Aventis Inc. v. Laboratoire Riva Inc., 2007 FC 532 (2007)
... Justice Harringto n Docket: T-1384-04 BETWEEN: and SANOFI-AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GmbH Applicants and and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH Respondents SCHERING Respondent/ ...... Insofar as patent 1,341,206 (‘206) (which is owned by the respondent Schering Corporation but listed by Sanofi-...
-
Case Law
Federal Court - June 04, 2008
Nature's Path Foods Inc. v. Country Fresh Enterprises Inc., 2007 FC 116 (2007)
... 7(b) in relation to sesame tahini products, was dismissed on August 4, 1999, by order silent as to costs, for delay after the Plaintiff failed to respond to a Notice of Status Review requiring it to ...
-
Case Law
Federal Court - June 04, 2008
Pfizer Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2006 FC 220 (2006)
...a, Ontario , February 17, 2006 Justice von Finckenstein BETWEEN: and PFIZER LIMITED Applicants and Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER AND [1] This is an ...... a Notice of Compliance (“NOC”) to the Respondent, Ratiopharm Inc. (“Ratiopharm”), ...
-
Case Law
Federal Court - June 04, 2008
Fournier Pharma Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2004 FC 1718 (2004)
...ate: 20041214 Docket: T-371-03 Citation: 2004 FC 1718 BETWEEN: and Applicants and THE MINISTER OF HEALTH and CIPHER PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED Respondents REASONS FOR _ Confidential Reasons for ...
-
Case Law
Federal Court - June 04, 2008
Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Novopharm Ltd., 2006 FC 1234 (2006)
... is required; ) Has the patent, in as much as claim 4 is concerned, failed to provide a correct, full and clear description as required by section 34(1) of the old Patent Act particularly in respect of the disclosures as to toxicity and solubility?...
Refine search
Search within 9 Search results “res judicata california”