Actra Fraternal Benefit Society v. Canada (1997)

Federal Court of Appeal, (April 30, 1997)

Docket number: A-491-95

Actra Fraternal Benefit Society v. Canada
Permanent Link: http://ca.vlex.com/vid/actra-fraternal-benefit-society-v-canada-38510740
Id. vLex: VLEX-38510740

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Sponsored Ads:


Extract:

Actra Fraternal Benefit Society v. Canada (1997)

Federal Court Reports

ACTRA Fraternal Benefit Society v. Canada (C.A.) [1997] 3 F.C. 441

A-491-95 CORAM: STRAYER J.A.

ROBERTSON J.A.

McDONALD J.A.

IN RE: The Income Tax Act , 1952 R.S.C. c. 148

BETWEEN:

ACTRA FRATERNAL BENEFIT SOCIETY,

Appellant,

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

Respondent.

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on Tuesday, March 18, 1997.

Judgment rendered at Ottawa on Wednesday, April 30, 1997.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: ROBERTSON J.A.

CONCURRED IN BY: STRAYER J.A.

McDONALD J.A.L

A-491-95 CORAM: STRAYER J.A.

ROBERTSON J.A.

McDONALD J.A.

IN RE: The Income Tax Act , 1952 R.S.C. c. 148

BETWEEN:

ACTRA FRATERNAL BENEFIT SOCIETY,

Appellant,

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

Respondent.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

ROBERTSON J.A.

The appellant taxpayer is a fraternal benefit society incorporated under the provisions of the Canadian and British Insurance Companies Act , R.S.C. 1970, c. I-15 as amended (hereafter the " Insurance Act "). Pursuant to paragraph 149(1)(k) and subsection 149(3) of the Income Tax Act such entities are subject only to federal income tax on taxable income attributable to their life insurance business. Income derived from other sources is exempt. The principal issue raised in this appeal is whether all of the investment income derived from assets contained within a "life insurance fund" (hereafter the "life fund") is to be included when computing taxable income from a fraternal society's life insurance business. Before the Minister of National Revenue and the Tax Court, the taxpayer argued that in cases where the assets in the life fund exceed what is necessary for purposes of the life insurance business, only the investment income earned on the necessary amounts should be treated as taxable income. Both the Minister and the Tax Court Judge rejected this argument. In my respectful opinion, the appeal from the decision of the Tax Court must be allowed. As that decision is now reported it is unnecessary to offer an exhaustive analysis of the facts as did the learned Tax Court Judge: see [1995] 2 C.T.C. 2671.

******

A fraternal benefit society offers its members a variety of benefits. In the present case the taxpayer maintains three funds from which it is ab...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from Canada including:

  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • Legislation
  • News and Business

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
the lesson learned: put breakup rules in writing | Showbits | Canada c. Phénix (2000) | paramedics tied up in hospitals | Par sabiedriskā labuma organizācijas statusa piešķiršanu biedrībai 'Virves vilkšanas klubs 'OZOLI'' | Justice de paix du canton de Jodoigne Par ordonnance du juge de paix du canton de Jodoigne ren... | Sanitair en C.V. Waasland, naamloze vennootschap, Winninglaan 7, 9140 TEMSE Ondernemingsnummer 0442.338.707 RPR Dendermonde... | Convention collective de travail du 26 avril 1995 de la Commission paritai... | Arrêt Cour de cassation Cour de Cassation Nº 66-93518 December 07 1967 | Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Mechelen Bij akte, verleden ter griffie van... | Arrete du 26 octobre 2006 portant delegation de signature (delegation aux affaires europeennes et internationales) | Immobiliere Ronamic, societe anonyme, chaussee de Waterloo 63, 1060 Bruxelles R.P.M. Bruxelles 0435.608.885 Assemblee generale ordinaire, le 7 avril 2009, a...