Aigbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Citation | 2020 FC 895 |
Date | 14 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Bashir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1441
...not be at risk in the proposed IFA, that it would be unreasonable in all the circumstances for them to relocate there: see Aigbe v Canada, 2020 FC 895 at para 9; for the IFA test generally, see my discussion in Sadiq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 430 at paras 38-45 and the......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...[21] The onus is on the applicants to defeat at least one prong of the two prong test: Aigbe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895 at para 9. [22] In carrying out this analysis, a decision-maker “must assume the claimant has a well‑founded fear of prosecution in ......
-
Engenlbers v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1545
...not be at risk in the proposed IFA, that it would be unreasonable in all the circumstances for them to relocate there: see Aigbe v Canada, 2020 FC 895 at para 9; for the IFA test generally, see my discussion in Sadiq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 430 at paras 38-45 and the......
-
Visbal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...them in other cities is unreasonable. In support of her submissions, she cites Aigbe v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895 [Aigbe]. [13] In Aigbe, the Court ruled that having assumed that the applicants were credible, the Refugee Appeal Division (“RAD”......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Bashir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1441
...not be at risk in the proposed IFA, that it would be unreasonable in all the circumstances for them to relocate there: see Aigbe v Canada, 2020 FC 895 at para 9; for the IFA test generally, see my discussion in Sadiq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 430 at paras 38-45 and the......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...[21] The onus is on the applicants to defeat at least one prong of the two prong test: Aigbe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895 at para 9. [22] In carrying out this analysis, a decision-maker “must assume the claimant has a well‑founded fear of prosecution in ......
-
Visbal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...them in other cities is unreasonable. In support of her submissions, she cites Aigbe v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895 [Aigbe]. [13] In Aigbe, the Court ruled that having assumed that the applicants were credible, the Refugee Appeal Division (“RAD”......
-
Engenlbers v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1545
...not be at risk in the proposed IFA, that it would be unreasonable in all the circumstances for them to relocate there: see Aigbe v Canada, 2020 FC 895 at para 9; for the IFA test generally, see my discussion in Sadiq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 430 at paras 38-45 and the......
Request a trial to view additional results