Aigbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2020 FC 895
Date14 September 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Bashir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1441
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 21, 2022
    ...not be at risk in the proposed IFA, that it would be unreasonable in all the circumstances for them to relocate there: see Aigbe v Canada, 2020 FC 895 at para 9; for the IFA test generally, see my discussion in Sadiq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 430 at paras 38-45 and the......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 30, 2021
    ...[21] The onus is on the applicants to defeat at least one prong of the two prong test: Aigbe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895 at para 9. [22] In carrying out this analysis, a decision-maker “must assume the claimant has a well‑founded fear of prosecution in ......
  • Engenlbers v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1545
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 14, 2022
    ...not be at risk in the proposed IFA, that it would be unreasonable in all the circumstances for them to relocate there: see Aigbe v Canada, 2020 FC 895 at para 9; for the IFA test generally, see my discussion in Sadiq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 430 at paras 38-45 and the......
  • Visbal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 25, 2021
    ...them in other cities is unreasonable. In support of her submissions, she cites Aigbe v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895 [Aigbe]. [13] In Aigbe, the Court ruled that having assumed that the applicants were credible, the Refugee Appeal Division (“RAD”......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Bashir v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1441
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 21, 2022
    ...not be at risk in the proposed IFA, that it would be unreasonable in all the circumstances for them to relocate there: see Aigbe v Canada, 2020 FC 895 at para 9; for the IFA test generally, see my discussion in Sadiq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 430 at paras 38-45 and the......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • July 30, 2021
    ...[21] The onus is on the applicants to defeat at least one prong of the two prong test: Aigbe v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895 at para 9. [22] In carrying out this analysis, a decision-maker “must assume the claimant has a well‑founded fear of prosecution in ......
  • Visbal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • October 25, 2021
    ...them in other cities is unreasonable. In support of her submissions, she cites Aigbe v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 895 [Aigbe]. [13] In Aigbe, the Court ruled that having assumed that the applicants were credible, the Refugee Appeal Division (“RAD”......
  • Engenlbers v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1545
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 14, 2022
    ...not be at risk in the proposed IFA, that it would be unreasonable in all the circumstances for them to relocate there: see Aigbe v Canada, 2020 FC 895 at para 9; for the IFA test generally, see my discussion in Sadiq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 430 at paras 38-45 and the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT