Extrait
Artigua c. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2011 FC 1294 (2011)
Federal Court - Artigua v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)Source: http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/2011/2011fc1294/2011fc1294.htmlDate: 20111109Docket: IMM-7836-11Citation: 2011 FC 1294Vancouver, British Columbia , November 9, 2011PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice ShoreBETWEEN: DURAN ARTIGA, JUAN RAMON Applicant and MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETYAND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENTI. Overview[1] This Court has held that a removals officer does not perform an adjudicative function and any duty on that officer to provide reasons is minimal. In fact, the Court in Boniowski v Canada (MCI) , 2004 FC 1161 (QL/Lexis) , stated the following in regards to the adequacy of reasons provided by an enforcement officer in response to a deferral request:[11] … any reasons requirement was fulfilled in the decision letter of September 12, 2003 where...Voir le contenu complet de ce document
Liens sponsorisés