Bruno v. Samson Cree Nation, 2006 FCA 249 (2006)
Federal Court of Appeal, (July 04, 2006)
Docket number: A-538-05
Bruno v. Samson Cree Nation
Linked as:Federal Court of Appeal, (July 04, 2006)
Docket number: A-538-05
Bruno v. Samson Cree Nation
Linked as:Extract
Bruno v. Samson Cree Nation, 2006 FCA 249 (2006)
Date: 20060704
Docket: A-538-05Citation: 2006 FCA 249CORAM: LINDEN J.A.NADON J.A.EVANS J.A.BETWEEN:DARREL REGAN BRUNO and DARWIN SOOSAYAppellantsandTHE ELECTION APPEAL BOARD OF THE SAMSON CREE NATIONandCHIEF VICTOR BUFFALO, on his own behalf and on behalf of theSAMSON INDIAN BAND also known as SAMSON CREE NATION and theSAMSON INDIAN BAND also known as SAMSON CREE NATIONRespondent sHeard at Edmonton, Alberta , on May 30, 2006.Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario , on July 4, 2006REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: NADON J.A.CONCURRED IN BY: LINDEN J.A.EVANS J.A.Date: 20060704Docket: A-538-05Citation: 2006 FCA 249CORAM: LINDEN J.A.NADON J.A.EVANS J.A.BETWEEN:DARREL REGAN BRUNO and DARWIN SOOSAYAppellantsandTHE ELECTION APPEAL BOARD OF THE SAMSON CREE NATIONandCHIEF VICTOR BUFFALO, on his own behalf and on behalf of theSAMSON INDIAN BAND also known as SAMSON CREE NATION and theSAMSON INDIAN BAND also known as SAMSON CREE NATIONRespondentsREASONS FOR JUDGMENT[1] On May 19, 2005, elections were held by the Samson Cree Nation (the Band), a First Nation with approximately 3,363 eligible voters, to select a Band Council. Of the 86 members of the Band who stood for election, 12 were elected to the Council.[2] Following the elections, the appellants, members of the Band and defeated candidates, challenged the electoral results. Firstly, the appellant Soosay challenged the election of Larron Northwest on the ground that he was not qualified to run for office by reason of a non-pardoned criminal record. Secondly, the appellant Bruno challenged the outcome of the elections on the ground that, contrary to the Samson Cree Nation Election Law (the Election Law), the Electoral Supervisor allowed voting to continue beyond 6:00pm.[3] As required by section 82 of the Election Law, the appellants served their complaints on the Chairman of the Samson Election Appeal Board (...See the full content of this document
If you are already a vLex customer, access here