David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,COURTS,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | 2017 FC 682 |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 13 July 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
GCT Canada Limited Partnership v. Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, 2020 FC 348
...at a preliminary stage, but rather the issue should be determined by the applications judge: David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682 at para 7 (“David Suzuki”); aff’d 2018 FC 380; David Bull supra at para 15; Apotex Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2010 FC 1310 at para 1......
-
KEY FIRST NATION v. STEPHANIE C. LAVALLEE, DONALD WORME, RODNEY BRASS, ANGELA DESJARLAIS, SIDNEY KESHANE AND GLEN O'SOUP,
...a bar to classifying the matter as a reviewable “continuous course of conduct” (David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682, 2017 CarswellNat 3285 at para. 28). [36] It is only when the “matter” is a discrete decision or order that the time limit of 3......
-
David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 411
...from the decision of the case manager, Prothonotary Aylen, on a preliminary motion to strike (David Suzuki Foundation v Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682 [“Suzuki 1”]). In the motion to strike, the respondents (as they then were) were seeking to strike the application as they argued that the Dav......
-
David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2018 FC 380
...dismissed their motions to strike the Applicants’ Applications for Judicial Review (reported at David Suzuki Foundation v Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682). [2] The Applicants (who were the Respondents on the Motion and are the Respondents on this Appeal) are a group of non-governmental organiz......
4 cases
-
GCT Canada Limited Partnership v. Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, 2020 FC 348
...at a preliminary stage, but rather the issue should be determined by the applications judge: David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682 at para 7 (“David Suzuki”); aff’d 2018 FC 380; David Bull supra at para 15; Apotex Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2010 FC 1310 at para 1......
-
KEY FIRST NATION v. STEPHANIE C. LAVALLEE, DONALD WORME, RODNEY BRASS, ANGELA DESJARLAIS, SIDNEY KESHANE AND GLEN O'SOUP,
...a bar to classifying the matter as a reviewable “continuous course of conduct” (David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682, 2017 CarswellNat 3285 at para. 28). [36] It is only when the “matter” is a discrete decision or order that the time limit of 3......
-
David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 411
...from the decision of the case manager, Prothonotary Aylen, on a preliminary motion to strike (David Suzuki Foundation v Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682 [“Suzuki 1”]). In the motion to strike, the respondents (as they then were) were seeking to strike the application as they argued that the Dav......
-
David Suzuki Foundation v. Canada (Health), 2018 FC 380
...dismissed their motions to strike the Applicants’ Applications for Judicial Review (reported at David Suzuki Foundation v Canada (Health), 2017 FC 682). [2] The Applicants (who were the Respondents on the Motion and are the Respondents on this Appeal) are a group of non-governmental organiz......