Defence Lawyer Grilled Over Adult Sentencing

Summary


"Why did you agree to an adult sentence?," he pointedly asked Gisele Champagne after she submitted her arguments asking that Beardy's penalty be concurrent with a sentence he's already serving.

[Ron Meyers] decided to hand Beardy a 90-day adult penalty for striking -- but not injuring -- an RCMP officer with a piece of broken glass during "an uprising" involving five young offenders at the Agassiz Youth Centre on Sept. 30.

In arguing that the teen should receive a sentence that added no extra time to his penalty, Champagne presented reports detailing how Beardy came from a dysfunctional family that led him towards gang life, and that his "impulsive behaviour" is largely due to having an intelligence quotient lower than 70. An IQ of about 90-110 is considered normal.

See the full content of this document

Extract


Defence Lawyer Grilled Over Adult Sentencing

Agreed to procedure for mentally limited boy

A Manitoba judge is questioning why the lawyer of a 15-year-old boy with limite...

See the full content of this document

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex Canada

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company