Fabrikant v. The Queen, 2018 FCA 206
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FCA 206 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Date | 13 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Fabrikant v. The Queen, 2018 FCA 224
...THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER STRATAS J.A. A. Introduction [1] Further to its reasons in Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 206 (Fabrikant No. 2), and having received and considered written representations on the matter, this Court concludes that a further regulatory ......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Fabrikant, 2019 FCA 198
...litigation behaviour, are understandably slow to devise, craft and adopt approaches to address it: see, e.g., Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 206, where, after ruling on many motions for waivers of filing fees, this Court adopted the rule that it should first examine whether the underlying pr......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Simon, 2022 FC 1135
...can be necessary to protect judicial resources (Simon FCA at para 10, referring to Fabrikant v Canada, 2018 FCA 171; Fabrikant v Canada, 2018 FCA 206 and Fabrikant v Canada, 2018 FCA 224). This is the purpose and raison d’être of vexatious litigant declarations. [23] Section 40 of the Act i......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Turmel, 2022 FC 1526
...measures in the Rules suffice. For some, tougher regulatory measures are needed: Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 171; Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 206; Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 224. Further, in the cases of a select few, the nature and quality of their behaviour, the actual or likely re......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Fabrikant v. The Queen, 2018 FCA 224
...THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER STRATAS J.A. A. Introduction [1] Further to its reasons in Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 206 (Fabrikant No. 2), and having received and considered written representations on the matter, this Court concludes that a further regulatory ......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Fabrikant, 2019 FCA 198
...litigation behaviour, are understandably slow to devise, craft and adopt approaches to address it: see, e.g., Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 206, where, after ruling on many motions for waivers of filing fees, this Court adopted the rule that it should first examine whether the underlying pr......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Simon, 2022 FC 1135
...can be necessary to protect judicial resources (Simon FCA at para 10, referring to Fabrikant v Canada, 2018 FCA 171; Fabrikant v Canada, 2018 FCA 206 and Fabrikant v Canada, 2018 FCA 224). This is the purpose and raison d’être of vexatious litigant declarations. [23] Section 40 of the Act i......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Turmel, 2022 FC 1526
...measures in the Rules suffice. For some, tougher regulatory measures are needed: Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 171; Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 206; Fabrikant v. Canada, 2018 FCA 224. Further, in the cases of a select few, the nature and quality of their behaviour, the actual or likely re......
Request a trial to view additional results