Farah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1162 |
| Date | 16 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Gul v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 812
...the Officer’s analysis of the Applicant’s risk reasonable? [12] As I recently articulated in Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162 at paragraph 7 in light of the different paths taken by this Court, the standard of review applicable to a PRRA officer’s decision to allow......
-
Alghanem v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...as a whole that the officer applied the correct test and conducted a proper analysis (Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162 at para 17; Lopez Segura v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC 894 at para 29). [27] However, I do not find that this was an isolated er......
-
Jama v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459
...to Canada seeking protection (Mohamed v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 522; Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162; Ahmed v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 80; Mohamed v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 139). In these cases, the ......
-
Lozano Caceres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 179
...about the Applicant’s refugee status was made by the RPD or by the PRRA officer. [21] Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162 [Farah], relied on by the Respondent, is similarly distinguishable. In Farah, the applicant was inadmissible due to serious criminality and......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Gul v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 812
...the Officer’s analysis of the Applicant’s risk reasonable? [12] As I recently articulated in Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162 at paragraph 7 in light of the different paths taken by this Court, the standard of review applicable to a PRRA officer’s decision to allow......
-
Alghanem v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...as a whole that the officer applied the correct test and conducted a proper analysis (Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162 at para 17; Lopez Segura v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC 894 at para 29). [27] However, I do not find that this was an isolated er......
-
Jama v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1459
...to Canada seeking protection (Mohamed v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 522; Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162; Ahmed v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 80; Mohamed v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 139). In these cases, the ......
-
Lozano Caceres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 179
...about the Applicant’s refugee status was made by the RPD or by the PRRA officer. [21] Farah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1162 [Farah], relied on by the Respondent, is similarly distinguishable. In Farah, the applicant was inadmissible due to serious criminality and......
Request a trial to view additional results