Galamb v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 135

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 135
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date06 February 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Luo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 823
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 17, 2019
    ...claim (Guven; Ismaili v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 84 [Ismaili]; Galamb v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 135). [14] Further, they assert that the RPD made factual findings without regard for the evidence. Specifically, the RPD erred in finding that it was i......
  • Gul v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 812
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 14, 2019
    ...to require corroborating evidence for a letter of support unless the credibility of the statements is in doubt (Galamb v Canada (MCI), 2018 FC 135). The Applicant argues that the Officer circumvented the requirement to make credibility findings in clear and unmistakable terms by framing the......
  • Galamb v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 85
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 21, 2020
    ...remitted the matter back to the RAD for redetermination by a differently constituted panel (Galamb v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 135 [Galamb]). Justice Campbell found that the RAD made an invalid negative credibility finding, and set the decision aside as unreasonable on t......
  • Abba-Okereke v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1243
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 27, 2019
    ...in reaching a conclusion. The benefit of any unsupported doubt must go to the person giving the evidence. [7]  In Galamb v MCI, 2018 FC 135, it states at paragraph 10: As to the requirement of supplying corroborating evidence, the Immigration and Refugee Board’s on-line publicat......
4 cases
  • Luo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 823
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 17, 2019
    ...claim (Guven; Ismaili v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 84 [Ismaili]; Galamb v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 135). [14] Further, they assert that the RPD made factual findings without regard for the evidence. Specifically, the RPD erred in finding that it was i......
  • Gul v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 812
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 14, 2019
    ...to require corroborating evidence for a letter of support unless the credibility of the statements is in doubt (Galamb v Canada (MCI), 2018 FC 135). The Applicant argues that the Officer circumvented the requirement to make credibility findings in clear and unmistakable terms by framing the......
  • Galamb v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 85
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 21, 2020
    ...remitted the matter back to the RAD for redetermination by a differently constituted panel (Galamb v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 135 [Galamb]). Justice Campbell found that the RAD made an invalid negative credibility finding, and set the decision aside as unreasonable on t......
  • Abba-Okereke v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1243
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 27, 2019
    ...in reaching a conclusion. The benefit of any unsupported doubt must go to the person giving the evidence. [7]  In Galamb v MCI, 2018 FC 135, it states at paragraph 10: As to the requirement of supplying corroborating evidence, the Immigration and Refugee Board’s on-line publicat......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT