Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Citation2017 FC 1156
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date15 December 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 271
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 26 de março de 2021
    ...(Qi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 400 (“Qi”) at para 18; Gao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156 (“Gao”) at para 29). [30] Finally, I am not persuaded by the Applicant’s argument that the RAD unreasonably raised the thres......
  • Lin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1057
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 de outubro de 2018
    ...practices. [24] In fact the PA’s situation here is most comparable to that of the applicant in Gao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156. The applicants in both cases were deemed by the RAD to be “not unsophisticated” and alleged to have practiced Falun Gong for similar amoun......
  • Liang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 115
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 1 de fevereiro de 2022
    ...activities (Qi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 400 (“Qi”) at para 18; Gao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156 (“Gao”) at para 29). [30] Finally, I am not persuaded by the Applicant’s argument that the RAD unreasonably raised the threshold of knowledge requir......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 363
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 17 de março de 2022
    ...(Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 968, [2020] 4 FCR 617, at paras 23 and following; Gao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156, at para 33. I add that although neither party referred to the legal analysis in Senadheerage, at paras 23-36, the RAD appears to have satisfied ......
4 cases
  • Gao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 271
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 26 de março de 2021
    ...(Qi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 400 (“Qi”) at para 18; Gao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156 (“Gao”) at para 29). [30] Finally, I am not persuaded by the Applicant’s argument that the RAD unreasonably raised the thres......
  • Lin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1057
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 de outubro de 2018
    ...practices. [24] In fact the PA’s situation here is most comparable to that of the applicant in Gao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156. The applicants in both cases were deemed by the RAD to be “not unsophisticated” and alleged to have practiced Falun Gong for similar amoun......
  • Liang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 115
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 1 de fevereiro de 2022
    ...activities (Qi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 400 (“Qi”) at para 18; Gao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156 (“Gao”) at para 29). [30] Finally, I am not persuaded by the Applicant’s argument that the RAD unreasonably raised the threshold of knowledge requir......
  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 363
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 17 de março de 2022
    ...(Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 968, [2020] 4 FCR 617, at paras 23 and following; Gao v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1156, at para 33. I add that although neither party referred to the legal analysis in Senadheerage, at paras 23-36, the RAD appears to have satisfied ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT