A.H.A. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 787
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Citation | 2020 FC 787 |
Date | 24 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Aedo Arancibia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1245
...abuse in evaluating the abuser’s motivation to locate the claimants (see for example: AHA v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 787 at paras 13-15; Figarola Ahumada v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 246 at paras 54, 56, [17] The Respondent argues that the RAD ......
-
Sanchez Rovirosa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...this conclusion is inconsistent with EV having threatened them for two decades. They rely on AHA v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 787 [AHA], in which Justice Shore found unreasonable the RAD’s conclusion that the agent of persecution in that case lacked the motivation ......
2 cases
-
Aedo Arancibia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1245
...abuse in evaluating the abuser’s motivation to locate the claimants (see for example: AHA v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 787 at paras 13-15; Figarola Ahumada v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 246 at paras 54, 56, [17] The Respondent argues that the RAD ......
-
Sanchez Rovirosa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...this conclusion is inconsistent with EV having threatened them for two decades. They rely on AHA v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 787 [AHA], in which Justice Shore found unreasonable the RAD’s conclusion that the agent of persecution in that case lacked the motivation ......