Extract
John Doe v. Bennett, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 436, 2004 SCC 17, 2004 SCC 17 (2004)
John Doe v. Bennett, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 436, 2004 SCC 17
Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation ofSt. George's Appellant v.John Doe ("a pseudonym") and John Doe("a pseudonym") Respondents and betweenJohn Doe ("a pseudonym") and John Doe("a pseudonym") Appellants on cross-appeal v.Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation ofSt. George's Respondent on cross-appeal andAlphonsus Penney, Raymond Lahey, RomanCatholic Episcopal Corporation of St. John's,James MacDonald, and the Roman Catholic Church Respondents on cross-appeal andAttorney General of Canada and CanadianConference of Catholic Bishops IntervenersIndexed as: John Doe v. BennettNeutral citation: 2004 SCC 17.File No.: 29426.2004: January 14; 2004: March 25.Present: McLachlin C.J. and Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour, LeBel, Deschamps and Fish JJ.on appeal from the court of appeal for newfoundland and labradorTorts - Intentional torts - Liability - Corporation sole - Sexual abuse - Boys sexually abused by priest - Whether episcopal corporation liable for priest's sexual assault of boys - Whether corporation sole's activities and liability confined to matters pertaining to property.Torts - Vicarious liability - Intentional torts - Sexual abuse - Boys sexually abused by priest - Whether episcopal corporation vicariously liable for priest's sexual assault of boys.Over a period of almost two decades, B, a Roman Catholic priest in Newfoundland, sexually assaulted boys in his parishes. The plaintiff-respondents sued the appellant episcopal corporation and the Roman Catholic Church, among others. The trial judge found the appellant vicariously liable but dismissed the claim aga...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links