Kemp v. Ross, 2018 BCSC 1320

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice Milman
Citation2018 BCSC 1320
Docket NumberS178235
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date07 August 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Kemp Estate v. Ross (A.M. Ross Law Corporation),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 25, 2021
    ...The judgment of Justice Milman, granting leave to review the accounts but not the forbearance or variation agreements; Kemp v. Ross, 2018 BCSC 1320 (“Leave to Review [23]        In his reasons, the Registrar referred to each of these decisions (and ......
  • Kemp v. Ross,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 20, 2021
    ...expiry of the governing limitation period in s. 68(3) of the LPA and could only proceed with leave of the court. [5] In Kemp v. Ross 2018 BCSC 1320 the court allowed the application to review the lawyer’s accounts, but denied the application to examine the [6] With respect to the agreemen......
  • Vayeghan (Vayeghan Litigation) v. Shen, 2019 BCSC 1396
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 20, 2019
    ...but the last bill. [35]       Similar circumstances were considered by Mr. Justice Milman in Kemp v. Ross, 2018 BCSC 1320. In that case, the client retained a lawyer to handle a summary trial application. The lawyer argued that the limitation period under s. 70......
  • Grewal v. Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP, 2019 BCSC 1963
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 15, 2019
    ...Mide-Wilson v. Hungerford Tomyn Lawrenson and Nichols, 2013 BCCA 559 [Mide-Wilson] at para. 85; Kemp v. Ross (c.o.b. Ross Law Corp.), 2018 BCSC 1320 at para. [68]        I am doubtful that a registrar sitting on a fee review would possess the supervisory j......
4 cases
  • Kemp Estate v. Ross (A.M. Ross Law Corporation),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 25, 2021
    ...The judgment of Justice Milman, granting leave to review the accounts but not the forbearance or variation agreements; Kemp v. Ross, 2018 BCSC 1320 (“Leave to Review [23]        In his reasons, the Registrar referred to each of these decisions (and ......
  • Kemp v. Ross,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 20, 2021
    ...expiry of the governing limitation period in s. 68(3) of the LPA and could only proceed with leave of the court. [5] In Kemp v. Ross 2018 BCSC 1320 the court allowed the application to review the lawyer’s accounts, but denied the application to examine the [6] With respect to the agreemen......
  • Vayeghan (Vayeghan Litigation) v. Shen, 2019 BCSC 1396
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 20, 2019
    ...but the last bill. [35]       Similar circumstances were considered by Mr. Justice Milman in Kemp v. Ross, 2018 BCSC 1320. In that case, the client retained a lawyer to handle a summary trial application. The lawyer argued that the limitation period under s. 70......
  • Grewal v. Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP, 2019 BCSC 1963
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 15, 2019
    ...Mide-Wilson v. Hungerford Tomyn Lawrenson and Nichols, 2013 BCCA 559 [Mide-Wilson] at para. 85; Kemp v. Ross (c.o.b. Ross Law Corp.), 2018 BCSC 1320 at para. [68]        I am doubtful that a registrar sitting on a fee review would possess the supervisory j......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT