National bank of canada v. Corbeil, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 117 (1991)

Supreme Court of Canada, Supreme Court of Canada (February 07, 1991)

Docket number: 21741


Permanent Link: http://ca.vlex.com/vid/national-bank-canada-v-corbeil-37667332
Id. vLex: VLEX-37667332

Acceda a este documento
y pruebe vLex GRATIS durante 3 días

Sponsored Ads:


Headnotes:

Extract:

National bank of canada v. Corbeil, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 117 (1991)

National Bank of Canada v. Corbeil, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 117

Les Équipements Lorac Ltée and

Pierre Corbeil Appellants v.

National Bank of Canada Respondent indexed as: national bank of canada v. corbeil

File No.: 21741.

1990: October 4; 1991: February 7.

Present: La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier and McLachlin JJ.

on appeal from the court of appeal for quebec

Banks and banking operations -- Powers of banks -- Loans and security -- Bank's obligations towards defaulting debtor in exercising rights over property under ss. 178 and 179 of Bank Act -- Bank renouncing its rights and abandoning property to third party -- Whether bank liable to debtor for value of property as damages.

In 1982, the respondent bank extended credit to Lorac secured by rights and powers, determined pursuant to s. 178 of the Bank Act, over merchandise owned by Lorac. Corbeil, Lorac's director and principal shareholder, gave a personal guarantee for this loan and hypothecated one of his properties as collateral. In 1983, the bank took possession of Lorac's merchandise following its default to repay its loan. The bank advertised the merchandise for sale in a newspaper and, unable to find a new buyer, renounced its rights and abandoned the merchandise to a third party. The evidence at trial indicated that, in the bank's opinion, the merchandise was worth less than the cost of moving it and storing it. The bank instituted an action against Lorac and Corbeil for recovery of the balance of the loan. Lorac filed a cross-demand for the value of the goods which the bank had seized and abandoned to a third party. The Superior Court allowed the bank's action in part and ordered Lorac to pay the bank $33,254.94. It also allowed the cross-demand in part, ordering the bank to pay $ 57, 701.88 in damages to Lorac which was the value of ...



Activate your free trial now

Make your order

Need help? Contact us

Try vLex for FREE for 3 days

Access legal information from Canada including:

  • Legal Books and Journals
  • Case Law
  • Legislation
  • News and Business

Try vLex without any commitment for 3 days and see why you need it.

3

days of Free Access



If you are already a vLex customer, Access Here

Sponsored Ads:


Other documents:
Showered with Affection | balfour c. nation crie de norway house, 2006 cf 616 (2006) | Lange s Photos Lauded | Our High-Profile Partner | paritair comité voor het kleding- en confectiebedrijf - collectieve arbeidsovereenkomst van 24 maart 199... | Arrêt - Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence Nº 61, January 24, 2006 | Arrêt Cour d appel de Colmar October 08 2004 | Avis relatif au jeu n° 64 Cote & Match | sentenza nº 414 of consiglio di stato of february 14 2005 | besluit 2006/680 van het college van de franse gemeenschapscommissie sluitende de gewone zitting van de vergadering van de franse gemeenschapscommissie... | Arrest of Hof van Cassatie - Belgie n P050135N, of 15 de Marzo de 2005