Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2017 FC 1111
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2017 FC 1111 |
| Date | 06 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
Angelcare Canada Inc. v. Munchkin, Inc., 2022 FC 507
...between parties (PCA, para 299). The Plaintiffs submit that Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2017 FC 1111 [Packers] and Corlac both support the notion that disclosure in the context of experimenting or testing a product with the assistance of another compa......
-
Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Videotron Ltd., 2022 FC 981
...10. The CMJ noted this Court has considered common design for patent infringement in two recent cases: Packers Plus v Essential Energy, 2017 FC 1111 [per O’Reilly J], aff’d in 2019 FCA 96 (although Justice O’Reilly’s ruling on common design was not an issue befor......
-
Rovi Guides, Inc. v. BCE Inc., 2022 FC 979
...… In Canada, this Court has considered common design for patent infringement in two cases: Packers Plus v Essential Energy, 2017 FC 1111 [Packers Plus] and Genentech v Celltrion, 2019 FC 293 [Genentech]. In Packers Plus, the defendant supplied the system which, when used in open hole......
-
Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2019 FCA 96
...[1] The appellants appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court in Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2017 FC 1111 (per O’Reilly J.) in which the Federal Court dismissed the claim of the appellant, Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. (Packers), that the resp......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Angelcare Canada Inc. v. Munchkin, Inc., 2022 FC 507
...between parties (PCA, para 299). The Plaintiffs submit that Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2017 FC 1111 [Packers] and Corlac both support the notion that disclosure in the context of experimenting or testing a product with the assistance of another compa......
-
Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Videotron Ltd., 2022 FC 981
...10. The CMJ noted this Court has considered common design for patent infringement in two recent cases: Packers Plus v Essential Energy, 2017 FC 1111 [per O’Reilly J], aff’d in 2019 FCA 96 (although Justice O’Reilly’s ruling on common design was not an issue befor......
-
Rovi Guides, Inc. v. BCE Inc., 2022 FC 979
...… In Canada, this Court has considered common design for patent infringement in two cases: Packers Plus v Essential Energy, 2017 FC 1111 [Packers Plus] and Genentech v Celltrion, 2019 FC 293 [Genentech]. In Packers Plus, the defendant supplied the system which, when used in open hole......
-
Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2019 FCA 96
...[1] The appellants appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court in Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2017 FC 1111 (per O’Reilly J.) in which the Federal Court dismissed the claim of the appellant, Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. (Packers), that the resp......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court Of Appeal: Obviousness Is An 'Inherently Factual' Inquiry
...Packers Plus FCA at para. 7. 4 Packers Plus FCA at para., 12, citing Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v. Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2017 FC 1111 at para. 147 ("Packers Plus 5 Packers Plus FCA at para. 14. 6 Packers Plus FCA at para. 15, citing Packers Plus FC at para. 192. 7 Packers P......
-
2017 Year In Review: Top 10 Judicial Decisions And Trends Of Import To The Canadian Energy Industry
...Energy Services Inc. v Essential Energy Services Ltd. In this case Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2017 FC 1111, the Federal Court declared a fracking-related patent held by Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. ("Packers") to be invalid and dismissed its cla......
-
Significant Federal Court Decision Finds Fracking-Related Patent To Be Invalid
...Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. v Essential Energy Services Ltd., 2017 FC 1111, the Federal Court declared a fracking-related patent held by Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. ("Packers Plus") to be invalid and dismissed a claim for patent infringement by Packers Plus against an oilfield s......
-
Something 'Not So New' In The World Of Fracking
...of infringement and instead invalidating its Canadian Patent No. 2,412,072 (the "Patent") on the basis of anticipation and obviousness (2017 FC 1111). The Appellate Court upheld the Trial Court's finding of invalidity on the basis of obviousness, finding it unnecessary to address the issues......
Request a trial to view additional results