Pooya v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 1019 |
| Date | 11 October 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Ehichoya v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1329
...at paras 23, 28, 34; Wu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 1102 at paras 14-16; Pooya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019 at paras 20-22). I agree with the Applicant that this principle is well-established in the jurisprudence. However, I note the holding from ......
-
Barros Barros v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 9
...because there is no evidence that contradicts his sworn testimony. Mr. Barros also points to Pooya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019, at paras 26–27, in support of his argument that the RPD erred in finding that his sworn testimony required corroboration. Mr. Barros’ argu......
-
Matsika v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 602
...for corroboration, “unless there are valid reasons to question a claimant’s credibility” (Pooya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019 at para 26). Consequently, the Court finds that the lack of corroborating evidence did not, in and of itself, undermine the Applicant’s credib......
-
Mahamoud v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1288
...material to his claim of persecution. He relies on Justice Alan Diner’s decision in Pooya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019 for the proposition that the IRB should be concerned with material, not collateral, details or omissions from a claimant’s BOC (at par......
5 cases
-
Jimenez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 410
...submitted by the Applicants, and the Applicants’ testimonies at the RPD hearing: Pooya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019 at para 18; A.B. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1385 at para 133; Soorasingam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 6......
-
Ehichoya v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1329
...at paras 23, 28, 34; Wu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 1102 at paras 14-16; Pooya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019 at paras 20-22). I agree with the Applicant that this principle is well-established in the jurisprudence. However, I note the holding from ......
-
Barros Barros v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 9
...because there is no evidence that contradicts his sworn testimony. Mr. Barros also points to Pooya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019, at paras 26–27, in support of his argument that the RPD erred in finding that his sworn testimony required corroboration. Mr. Barros’ argu......
-
Matsika v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 602
...for corroboration, “unless there are valid reasons to question a claimant’s credibility” (Pooya v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1019 at para 26). Consequently, the Court finds that the lack of corroborating evidence did not, in and of itself, undermine the Applicant’s credib......
Request a trial to view additional results