Popov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 177
Court | Federal Court of Appeal (Canada) |
Case Date | June 13, 2019 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | 2019 FCA 177 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Andrews v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 119
...to the Board’s discretion to grant an extension of time under section 61(b) is reasonableness: Popov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 177 at para. [11]Reasonableness is a deferential standard. It does not entitle a reviewing court to reweigh the evidence before the decision-mak......
1 cases
-
Andrews v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 119
...to the Board’s discretion to grant an extension of time under section 61(b) is reasonableness: Popov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FCA 177 at para. [11]Reasonableness is a deferential standard. It does not entitle a reviewing court to reweigh the evidence before the decision-mak......
1 books & journal articles
-
The Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board
...5(1). 76 Schenkman v Treasury Board (Public Works and Government Services Canada) , 2004 PSSRB 1. See Popov v Canada (Attorney General) , 2019 FCA 177 [ Popov ], as an example of the Federal Court of Appeal approving the “Schenkman factors.” See also Vidlak v Canada (Attorney General) , 200......