R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm
Citation2017 SCC 37,[2017] 1 SCR 967,349 CCC (3d) 383
Docket Number36771
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date06 July 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2022
    ...v. Suter, 2018 SCC 34, [2018] 2 S.C.R. 496; R. v. Tutton, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392; R. v. Hynes, 2001 SCC 82, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. Robinson, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 683; MacAskill v. The King, [1931] S.C.R. 330; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.......
  • Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...defaced, or removed. Thus, once the Crown establishes that the serial number on a firearm has been obliterated, 115 See R v Alex , [2017] 1 SCR 967 at para 12 (analyzing a prior version of the statutory scheme for impaired operation offences and describing the presumptions of fact as “evide......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...589, 675 R v Albert (1993), 19 CR (4th) 322 (Ont CA)..................................................... 643 R v Alex, [2017] 1 SCR 967 ................................................................................. 693 Table of Cases 715 R v Alexis, 2002 BCCA 103 .............................
  • Digest: R v Peepeetch, 2018 SKQB 66
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • February 18, 2019
    ...1985, c C-46, s Cases Considered: R v A.L.E., 2009 SKCA 65, [2011] 3 WWR 656, 359 Sask R 59, 256 CCC (3d) 476, 96 MVR (5th) 48 R v Alex, [2017] 1 SCR 967, 2017 SCC 37, 349 CCC (3d) 383 R v Bonter, 2013 SKQB 31, 412 Sask R 209 R v Brandt, 1997 CarswellAlta 1552, 36 WCB (2d) 422 R v Buettner,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • July 29, 2022
    ...v. Suter, 2018 SCC 34, [2018] 2 S.C.R. 496; R. v. Tutton, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392; R. v. Hynes, 2001 SCC 82, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; R. v. Robinson, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 683; MacAskill v. The King, [1931] S.C.R. 330; R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1985] 1 S.......
  • R. v. Sabattis, 2020 ONCJ 242
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • May 8, 2020
    ...Impaired driving in Canada 2015, (available at https: www150.statcan.gc.ca/nl/pub/85-002-x/2016001/article/14679-eng.htm) [40] R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, at para. [41] Lacasse, at para. 63. [42] R. v. Junkert, 2010 ONCA 549, at para. 46. [43] R. v. McVeigh (1985), 22 C.C.C. (3d) 145 (Ont. C.A......
  • TELUS Communications Inc. v. Wellman, 2019 SCC 19
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • April 4, 2019
    ...[2007] O.J. No. 4917, 162 A.C.W.S. (3d) 711; New Era Nutrition Inc. v. Balance Bar Co., 2004 ABCA 280, 245 D.L.R. (4th) 107; R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967; Rosedale Motors Inc. v. Petro‑Canada Inc. (1998), 42 O.R. (3d) 776; Brown v. Murphy (2002), 59 O.R. (3d) 404......
  • R. v. Hamel, 2020 ONCA 785
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 11, 2020
    ...the certificate could be used as evidence of their truth absent the availability of the presumptions; and iv. the decision in R. v. Alex, 2017 SCC 37, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 967 is irrelevant to the issues raised on appeal. [31] The appeal judge allowed the appeal. On the count of operation of a m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • The New Frontier For Global IP Litigation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 22, 2017
    ...US. [This article originally appeared in Managing Intellectual Property, September 2017] Footnotes 1 AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2017 SCC 37. 2 Eli Lilly and Co v Government of Canada, ICSID Case No 3 Nintendo of America Inc v King et al, 2017 FC 246. 4 Diageo Canada Inc v Heaven H......
3 books & journal articles
  • Rules Relating to the Use of Admissible Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...defaced, or removed. Thus, once the Crown establishes that the serial number on a firearm has been obliterated, 115 See R v Alex , [2017] 1 SCR 967 at para 12 (analyzing a prior version of the statutory scheme for impaired operation offences and describing the presumptions of fact as “evide......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...589, 675 R v Albert (1993), 19 CR (4th) 322 (Ont CA)..................................................... 643 R v Alex, [2017] 1 SCR 967 ................................................................................. 693 Table of Cases 715 R v Alexis, 2002 BCCA 103 .............................
  • Digest: R v Peepeetch, 2018 SKQB 66
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • February 18, 2019
    ...1985, c C-46, s Cases Considered: R v A.L.E., 2009 SKCA 65, [2011] 3 WWR 656, 359 Sask R 59, 256 CCC (3d) 476, 96 MVR (5th) 48 R v Alex, [2017] 1 SCR 967, 2017 SCC 37, 349 CCC (3d) 383 R v Bonter, 2013 SKQB 31, 412 Sask R 209 R v Brandt, 1997 CarswellAlta 1552, 36 WCB (2d) 422 R v Buettner,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT