R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Madam Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf
Citation2018 ABCA 99
Docket Number1703-0087-A
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date13 March 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 7 Diciembre 2020
    ...of Appeal does not possess the same advantage and must bear that in mind: WH, para 32; R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99, paras 33-38, 359 CCC (3d) [44]           In order to succeed on a claim of uneven scrutiny, an appellant must meet the threshold of......
  • R v Hornby, 2018 ABCA 377
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 Noviembre 2018
    ...to follow down that Vetrovec avenue of reasoning, he would have noted that the complainant was not herself a Vetrovec witness: R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99 at para 38, 359 CCC (3d) 443. For that matter, evidence from Vetrovec witnesses can in law provide confirmatory support to other Vetrovec witn......
  • R. v. Giovannelli, 2018 ONSC 4369
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 16 Julio 2018
    ...of a particular transaction may raise concerns as to that witness’ credibility and/or reliability as noted in R. v. D.E.Z., 2018 ABCA 99, at para. The absence of these details from her first statement about some of their prior interaction was not crucial. It was not automatically a m......
  • R v SMC, 2020 ABCA 19
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 21 Enero 2020
    ...on contemporary common sense. The Court of Appeal does not possess the same advantage and must bear that in mind: H(W), para 32; R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99, paras 33-38, 359 CCC (3d) 443. The trial judge may believe all, part or none of a witness’s evidence: R v R(D), [1996] 2 SCR 291, para 93, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • R v Mavros, 2020 ABCA 436
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 7 Diciembre 2020
    ...of Appeal does not possess the same advantage and must bear that in mind: WH, para 32; R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99, paras 33-38, 359 CCC (3d) [44]           In order to succeed on a claim of uneven scrutiny, an appellant must meet the threshold of......
  • R v Hornby, 2018 ABCA 377
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 16 Noviembre 2018
    ...to follow down that Vetrovec avenue of reasoning, he would have noted that the complainant was not herself a Vetrovec witness: R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99 at para 38, 359 CCC (3d) 443. For that matter, evidence from Vetrovec witnesses can in law provide confirmatory support to other Vetrovec witn......
  • R. v. Giovannelli, 2018 ONSC 4369
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 16 Julio 2018
    ...of a particular transaction may raise concerns as to that witness’ credibility and/or reliability as noted in R. v. D.E.Z., 2018 ABCA 99, at para. The absence of these details from her first statement about some of their prior interaction was not crucial. It was not automatically a m......
  • R v SMC, 2020 ABCA 19
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 21 Enero 2020
    ...on contemporary common sense. The Court of Appeal does not possess the same advantage and must bear that in mind: H(W), para 32; R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99, paras 33-38, 359 CCC (3d) 443. The trial judge may believe all, part or none of a witness’s evidence: R v R(D), [1996] 2 SCR 291, para 93, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT