R. v. A.G.W., [2018] SCJ No 9 (QL)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell |
| Citation | [2018] SCJ No 9 (QL),2018 SCC 9 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 37795 |
| Date | 19 February 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R v Holdsworth, 2019 ABQB 856
...on appeal in the absence of palpable and overriding error”. [30] Our Court of Appeal held in R v AGW, 2017 ABCA 247 at para 14, aff’d 2018 SCC 9, that in assessing whether a verdict is unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence, an appellate court must determine if it is not one that a pro......
-
R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99
...evidence: R v RP, 2012 SCC 22 at para 9, [2012] 1 SCR 746; MJB; R v AGW, 2017 ABCA 247 at paras 12 to 14, [2017] AJ No 808 (QL) affirmed 2018 SCC 9, [2018] S.C.J. No. 9 [21] As pointed out in the context of circumstantial evidence in R v Sandoval-Barillas, 2017 ABCA 154 at para 35, 348 CCC ......
-
Udemba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...reasonable. [14] The Applicant’s submissions on the applicable standard of review are generic, referencing Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2018 SCC 9; Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 306; Canada (MCI) v Huruglica, 2016 FCA 93 and other case law, and stating that the ......
-
Summaries Sunday: Supreme Advocacy
...the context of the “hold off” period for police questioning. Criminal Law: Sexual Assault with a Weapon R. v. A.G.W., 2018 SCC 9 (37795) Judgment rendered Feb. 19, There is a publication ban in this case and on the name of the party, with unanimous oral reasons by Justice Abella, dismissing......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
R v Holdsworth, 2019 ABQB 856
...on appeal in the absence of palpable and overriding error”. [30] Our Court of Appeal held in R v AGW, 2017 ABCA 247 at para 14, aff’d 2018 SCC 9, that in assessing whether a verdict is unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence, an appellate court must determine if it is not one that a pro......
-
R v DEZ, 2018 ABCA 99
...evidence: R v RP, 2012 SCC 22 at para 9, [2012] 1 SCR 746; MJB; R v AGW, 2017 ABCA 247 at paras 12 to 14, [2017] AJ No 808 (QL) affirmed 2018 SCC 9, [2018] S.C.J. No. 9 [21] As pointed out in the context of circumstantial evidence in R v Sandoval-Barillas, 2017 ABCA 154 at para 35, 348 CCC ......
-
Udemba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...reasonable. [14] The Applicant’s submissions on the applicable standard of review are generic, referencing Dunsmuir v New Brunswick, 2018 SCC 9; Kumar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 306; Canada (MCI) v Huruglica, 2016 FCA 93 and other case law, and stating that the ......
-
R. v. D.A., 2018 ONCA 612
...is in a condition that is consistent with the testimony the witness provides: see, e.g., R. v. A.G.W., 2017 ABCA 247, at para. 23, affirmed 2018 SCC 9. This is particularly so where, as here, no suggestion has been made that the object has been tampered E. Repetitive testimony [21] Finally,......