R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7

JurisdictionNova Scotia
JudgeJames L. Chipman
Citation2019 NSSC 7
CourtSupreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Date11 January 2019
Docket Number464560
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Gardner and Fraser,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 24 Junio 2021
    ...(a pilot); R. v. Wood, supra (an engineer); R. v. Harshbarger, supra (a hunter); R. v. Swanney, 2006 BCSC 1766 (a doctor); R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7 (a [71] In this case, the Crown did not tender expert evidence about the standard of care of a reasonable and prudent Booking Officer. That om......
  • R v Hoyeck, 2020 NSPC 24
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 5 Junio 2020
    ...Crown had not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he had done, or omitted to do anything, that caused Mr. Kempton’s death (R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7). Victim Impact [17] Mr. Kempton’s two adult daughters, Shannon Kempton and Carinna Ladouceur, submitted victim impact statements. They also......
  • R. v. Gardner,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 2 Junio 2022
    ...a significant contributory cause of his death. In this regard, I find similarities with the causation analysis I set out in R. v. Hoyek, 2019 NSSC 7: [68]      In determining whether a person can be held responsible for causing death, it must be determined whether t......
  • Monday’s Mix
    • Canada
    • Slaw Canada’s Online Legal Magazine
    • 20 Mayo 2019
    ...I found there were two very interesting facets to it that warranted bringing to the attention of members in Manitoba. R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7 concerns an employer who was charged with failing to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to an employee. The trial began before a judge an......
3 cases
  • R. v. Gardner and Fraser,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 24 Junio 2021
    ...(a pilot); R. v. Wood, supra (an engineer); R. v. Harshbarger, supra (a hunter); R. v. Swanney, 2006 BCSC 1766 (a doctor); R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7 (a [71] In this case, the Crown did not tender expert evidence about the standard of care of a reasonable and prudent Booking Officer. That om......
  • R v Hoyeck, 2020 NSPC 24
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 5 Junio 2020
    ...Crown had not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he had done, or omitted to do anything, that caused Mr. Kempton’s death (R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7). Victim Impact [17] Mr. Kempton’s two adult daughters, Shannon Kempton and Carinna Ladouceur, submitted victim impact statements. They also......
  • R. v. Gardner,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 2 Junio 2022
    ...a significant contributory cause of his death. In this regard, I find similarities with the causation analysis I set out in R. v. Hoyek, 2019 NSSC 7: [68]      In determining whether a person can be held responsible for causing death, it must be determined whether t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT