Rooke v. Canada (Health), 2019 FC 765
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | May 31, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2019 FC 765 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611
...to appeal to SCC refused, 38457 (2 May 2019); Martinez v Chaffin, 2019 ABQB 349 at para 82; Rooke v Canada (Health), 2019 FC 730, aff’d 2019 FC 765. However, this purported general judicial anti-SRL bias has also not been substantiated in any case, including this [31] As a Justice, I must b......
-
Ashraf v. Jazz Aviation, 2022 FCA 13
...rights of members of the class. As a result, representative plaintiffs must be represented by a solicitor: see Rooke v. Canada (Health), 2019 FC 765, [2019] F.C.J. No. 690 (QL) at para. 17. [11] As for Mr. Ashraf’s dismissal, it is clear from the jurisprudence that a collective agree......
2 cases
-
R v Stephan, 2019 ABQB 611
...to appeal to SCC refused, 38457 (2 May 2019); Martinez v Chaffin, 2019 ABQB 349 at para 82; Rooke v Canada (Health), 2019 FC 730, aff’d 2019 FC 765. However, this purported general judicial anti-SRL bias has also not been substantiated in any case, including this [31] As a Justice, I must b......
-
Ashraf v. Jazz Aviation, 2022 FCA 13
...rights of members of the class. As a result, representative plaintiffs must be represented by a solicitor: see Rooke v. Canada (Health), 2019 FC 765, [2019] F.C.J. No. 690 (QL) at para. 17. [11] As for Mr. Ashraf’s dismissal, it is clear from the jurisprudence that a collective agree......