Servus Credit Union Ltd v Sulyok, 2017 ABQB 611

JudgeS.L. Schulz, Master, Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
Citation2017 ABQB 611
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number1703 09026
Date10 December 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2018
    ...are “... the products of her body ...”: Toronto-Dominion Bank v Leadbetter, 2018 ABQB 472 at para 25, court access restrictions imposed 2017 ABQB 611. That, purportedly, prohibited the Crown from conducting criminal prosecutions of her [10] While traditional English common law did identify ......
  • Consumer Bankruptcy
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law in Canada. Cases, Materials, and Problems Part II
    • 23 Junio 2019
    ...refused to grant judgement against Mr. Sulyok for the Deiciency and ordered costs against Servus: Servus Credit Union Ltd v Sulyok , 2017 ABQB 611. . . . Grounds of Appeal [20] The grounds of appeal are that the Master erred by 1) concluding that the Deiciency was “released” or “extinguishe......
  • Idris v Mohamed,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Julio 2021
    ...as chattel property: SS (Re), 2016 ABPC 170; Toronto-Dominion Bank v Leadbetter, 2018 ABQB 472 at para 25, court access restricted 2017 ABQB 611; DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at paras 6-11; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 388 at paras 30-31, court access restricted 2019 ABQB 388; AVI v MHV......
  • Davidson v Alberta Health Services,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Noviembre 2021
    ...a child, or under guardianship), e.g.: SS (Re), 2016 ABPC 170; Toronto-Dominion Bank v Leadbetter, 2018 ABQB 472, court access restricted 2017 ABQB 611; DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 388, court access restricted 2019 ABQB 388; AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 489; Idri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2018
    ...are “... the products of her body ...”: Toronto-Dominion Bank v Leadbetter, 2018 ABQB 472 at para 25, court access restrictions imposed 2017 ABQB 611. That, purportedly, prohibited the Crown from conducting criminal prosecutions of her [10] While traditional English common law did identify ......
  • Idris v Mohamed,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Julio 2021
    ...as chattel property: SS (Re), 2016 ABPC 170; Toronto-Dominion Bank v Leadbetter, 2018 ABQB 472 at para 25, court access restricted 2017 ABQB 611; DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021 at paras 6-11; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 388 at paras 30-31, court access restricted 2019 ABQB 388; AVI v MHV......
  • Davidson v Alberta Health Services,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Noviembre 2021
    ...a child, or under guardianship), e.g.: SS (Re), 2016 ABPC 170; Toronto-Dominion Bank v Leadbetter, 2018 ABQB 472, court access restricted 2017 ABQB 611; DKD (Re) (Dependent Adult), 2018 ABQB 1021; CP (Re), 2019 ABQB 388, court access restricted 2019 ABQB 388; AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 489; Idri......
  • Servus Credit Union v Sulyok, 2018 ABQB 860
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Octubre 2018
    ...refused to grant judgement against Mr. Sulyok for the Deficiency and ordered costs against Servus: Servus Credit Union Ltd. v Sulyok, 2017 ABQB 611. Master’s Decision [17] The Master framed the issue as whether Servus could enforce the discharged bankrupt’s personal promise to pay. She cons......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Consumer Bankruptcy
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law in Canada. Cases, Materials, and Problems Part II
    • 23 Junio 2019
    ...refused to grant judgement against Mr. Sulyok for the Deiciency and ordered costs against Servus: Servus Credit Union Ltd v Sulyok , 2017 ABQB 611. . . . Grounds of Appeal [20] The grounds of appeal are that the Master erred by 1) concluding that the Deiciency was “released” or “extinguishe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT