Stuurman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 194
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 194 |
| Date | 20 February 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Bhujel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 828
...of time, which approach has been criticized by the Federal Court, citing: Stuurman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) [Stuurman], 2018 FC 194 at paras 23-24) This was done without explanation concerning the expected level of establishment of either the Applicants or the other residents ......
-
Quiros v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...FC 295, para 17; Henson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 1218, paras 28-31; Stuurman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 194, paras 22-24 [Stuurman]; Cojuhari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 1009, para 19; Ndlovu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)......
-
Shackleford v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1313
...reasonableness, not correctness. I share the view expressed by Boswell J. in Stuurman v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 194, at para 9, that: [9] An officer’s decision under subsection 25(1) is highly discretionary, since this provision “provides a mechanism to dea......
-
McDonald v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 394
...at paras 15-16; Chandidas v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2013 FC 258 at para 80; Stuurman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 194 at paras 19-24). The Applicant argues that the Officer in this case failed to account for the length of time she has spent in Canada, her hist......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Bhujel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 828
...of time, which approach has been criticized by the Federal Court, citing: Stuurman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) [Stuurman], 2018 FC 194 at paras 23-24) This was done without explanation concerning the expected level of establishment of either the Applicants or the other residents ......
-
Quiros v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...FC 295, para 17; Henson v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 1218, paras 28-31; Stuurman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 194, paras 22-24 [Stuurman]; Cojuhari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 1009, para 19; Ndlovu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)......
-
Shackleford v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1313
...reasonableness, not correctness. I share the view expressed by Boswell J. in Stuurman v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 194, at para 9, that: [9] An officer’s decision under subsection 25(1) is highly discretionary, since this provision “provides a mechanism to dea......
-
McDonald v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 394
...at paras 15-16; Chandidas v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2013 FC 258 at para 80; Stuurman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2018 FC 194 at paras 19-24). The Applicant argues that the Officer in this case failed to account for the length of time she has spent in Canada, her hist......
Request a trial to view additional results