-
Case Law › Alberta
44676 results for Case Law › Alberta
-
vLex Rating
- R v Ali, 2019 ABCA 408
- Edmonton (City of) Library Board v Edmonton (City of), 2019 ABCA 409
- R v Lim, 2019 ABCA 407
- R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406
- Raun v Shumborski, 2019 ABQB 823
- Smith v Edmonton Public School Board, 2019 ABQB 825
-
Simon v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ABQB 824
[1] On August 27, 2019, Zoltan Andrew Simon (Mr. Simon) filed a Statement of Claim in the Judicial Centre of Red Deer, Alberta, naming The Attorney General of Canada, Representing Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as the Defendant.
- Thember v King, 2019 ABCA 405
- Bentley v Hooton, 2019 ABQB 822
- Balisky v Balisky, 2019 ABCA 404
-
Aiyisa v Kasim et al, 2019 ABQB 821
[1] On September 25, 2019, Aihemaitijiang Aiyisa filed a Statement of Claim - Civil Restraining Order using the form provided by the Court. He also filed an Application returnable on October 28, 2019 and documents seeking ex parte orders for substitutional service. The matter was referred to me by the clerk as an Apparently Vexatious Application or Proceeding (“AVAP”) under Civil...
- Heddinger v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 820
- Gill v Singh, 2019 ABQB 819
- Johnsrud v Calgary Remand Centre, 2019 ABQB 817
- R v Neilson, 2019 ABCA 403
- R v Wanihadie, 2019 ABCA 402
- Pe Ben Oilfield Services (2006) Ltd v Arlint, 2019 ABCA 400
- R v AK, 2019 ABPC 264
- R v Buffalo, 2019 ABPC 263
- R v Sumner, 2019 ABCA 399
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation v Alberta, 2019 ABCA 401
- R v Prevost, 2019 ABCA 398
- R v JCF, 2019 ABCA 395
- Jobson v Jobson, 2019 ABQB 816
- Carter v Alberta (Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General), 2019 ABQB 808
- R v Geng, 2019 ABCA 397
- CB v AS, 2019 ABQB 811
- Condominium Corporation No. 042 5177 v Kuzio, 2019 ABQB 814
-
B(RM) v B(DT), 2019 ABQB 826
[1] Miss RB and Mr. DB appeared before this court for a summary hearing to determine custody and parenting in June and July 2019. Prior to that proceeding, the parties received not less than 18 orders of this court, focusing on parenting and financial decisions between the now-divorced parties. Their litigation has been in case management with two different Queen’s Bench Justices. Their
- Nadeau v Neilson, 2019 ABQB 810
