in Case Law › Federal Court
in vLex Canada

36003 results for Case Law › Federal Court

  • vLex Rating
  • McCrea v. Canada, 2019 FC 1426

    [1]  The Claimant, Carolyn Bowen, brings this application for review of claims decision determination pursuant to Section 8 of the Settlement Agreement reached in the context of this class action proceeding and approved by the Honourable Madam Justice Kane in her Order and Reasons dated January 29, 2019. Ms. Bowen seeks review of the determination of the Administrator of the EI Sickness...

  • Chowdhury v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1417

    [1]  This judicial review concerns the refusal by a visa officer in Singapore to issue a work permit on the basis of concern that the Applicant would not leave Canada at the end of the authorized period.

  • Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1416

    [1]  This judicial review concerns the rejection of the Applicant’s refugee claim under sections 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27. There were 11 credibility findings underpinning the Refugee Protection Division’s [RPD] decision.

  • Newland v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1418

    [1]  Richard Newland applied for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA), alleging that he would be in danger if removed to his native Jamaica since he had acted as a police informer and would be a target of violence by gang members. The Jamaica Constabulary wrote a submission letter on behalf of Mr. Newland, confirming that he had faced attacks and threats in Jamaica. The letter also said...

  • Evangelou v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1415

    [1]  Christos Evangelou [the Applicant] seeks a judicial review pursuant to section 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, LC 2001, c 27 [IRPA]. The application concerns a decision by an Officer of Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] refusing to waive his inadmissibility based on humanitarian and compassionate [H&C] grounds.

  • True North Centre for Public Policy v. Canada (Leaders’ Debates Commission), 2019 FC 1424

    [1]  These two applications for judicial review, both filed on Monday, October 7, 2019, relate to identical decisions made by the Leaders' Debates Commission / Commission des Debats des Chefs [the Commission].  The Commission denied accreditation for the 2019 Federal Leaders’ Debates to David Menzies and Keean Bexte of Rebel News Network Ltd [Rebel News] and Andrew James Lawton of True...

  • Isugi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1421

    [1]  The Refugee Protection Division (RPD) and the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) both found that the evidence adduced by Ms. Clarisse Isugi (the Principal Applicant) and her three children (the Minor Applicants) lacked credibility and rejected their claims for refugee protection.

  • Milad v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1409

    [1]  The Applicant, Mohamed Farag M.S. Milad, [Mr. Milad] seeks judicial review of the decision of an Immigration Officer [the Officer] refusing his application for permanent residence in Canada based on an exemption from the requirements of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [the Act] on humanitarian and compassionate grounds [H&C] pursuant to section 25 of the...

  • Oladele v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1410

    [1]  Mr. Demilade Kayode Oladele (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision made by a Delegate (the “Delegate”) of the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (the “Respondent”) refusing his application for permanent residence on Humanitarian and Compassionate (“H&C”) grounds pursuant to subsection 25 (1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, 2001, c.27 (the “Act”).

  • Woldemaryame v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1411

    [1]  This judicial review application concerns a redetermination by the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] following a judgment of this Court granting a judicial review application with respect to a previous RAD decision (2018 FC 58). This second challenge to a RAD decision is made pursuant to section 72 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27 [IRPA or the Act]. For the...

  • Bayer Inc. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., 2019 FC 1408

    [1]  The present action is, chronologically, the fifth action to have been commenced by Bayer pursuant to subsection 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations SOR/93-133 in relation to the drug rivaroxaban and the three patents listed against it. By this motion, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories seeks an order directing that the portions of the trial dealing with invalidity...

  • Milak v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1400

    [1]  This application is for a judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board [RPD], dated December 20, 2018, on a redetermination following an earlier decision in 2012. The Member refused the Applicants’ refugee claim [the Decision]. This application is brought pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act,

  • He v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1395

    [1]  This judicial review concerns a decision by the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] finding the Applicant not to be a refugee or in need of protection. Its decision was based principally on the RAD finding certain documents within the application to be fraudulent.

  • Huseynov v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1392

    [1]  This application judicially reviews a decision of the Refugee Appeal Division, or RAD, confirming the finding of the Refugee Protection Division, or RPD, that the Applicant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection. For the following reasons, I am dismissing the application.

  • Pao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1397

    [1]  Ms. Jun Yuan Pao (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of a decision of Mr. Alvin Fell, a Program Support Officer (the “Officer”) employed with Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (“IRCC”), refusing her application for the issuance of a Permanent Resident Card.

  • Balderramos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1391

    [1]  Orlin Rafael Rivera Balderramos [Mr. Balderramos], his spouse, Sinia Coello Castejon [Ms. Castejon] and two of their children [collectively referred to as “the Applicants”] seek  judicial review, pursuant to section 112 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [Act], from the October 12, 2018 decision of a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment [PRRA] Officer. The Officer...

  • George v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1385

    [1]  Frank Kofi George’s application for refugee protection was refused by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. The RPD found Mr. George’s claim of persecution to be implausible, found him to be not credible, and discounted the evidence that corroborated his story because of those credibility findings.

  • Vo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1387

    [1]  This judicial review concerns a decision of the Immigration Appeal Division [IAD] dismissing a sponsorship appeal. The central arguments raised relate to counsel incompetence and translation errors.

  • Jost v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1356

    [1]  After he retired from the Canadian Armed Forces in 2015, Mr Douglas Jost waited several months before receiving his pension. Other retirees from the CAF, both in the Regular Forces and the Reserves, also experienced delays.

  • Duggal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1382

    [1]  The present Application concerns an appeal of a Visa Officer’s rejection of the Applicant’s sponsorship application. On January 31, 2019, the IAD denied the Applicant’s appeal to sponsor her mother, father, and three of her siblings. A key issue at the appeal was whether the 2011 Regulation 133(1)(j)(i), or the 2014 Regulation 133(1)(j)(i)(B), of the Immigration and Refugee Protection...

  • Randhawa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1381

    [1]  The present Application concerns a January 15, 2019 decision of the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD), on appeal from an Immigration Officer’s decision to deny the Applicant’s application to sponsor her parents to Canada.

  • Morris v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1374

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of the decision of the Entitlement Appeal Panel [Appeal Panel] of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board [VRAB], dated September 26, 2018, in which the Appeal Panel affirmed the decision of the Entitlement Review Panel [Review Panel] of the VRAB, dated January 12, 2017, and denied the Applicant pension entitlement for myocardial infarction for...

  • Saudi Arabian Airlines Corp. v. Canada (Transportation Appeal Tribunal), 2019 FC 1378

    [1]  The present Application concerns the exercise of legislative authority by which the Transportation Appeal Tribunal of Canada (Tribunal or TATC) addresses complaints advanced to it by entities, such as the Applicant, with respect to enforcement action received from the Canadian Transportation Agency (Agency).

  • Huang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1366

    [1]  Yanxia Huang, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China, has applied for judicial review of a decision made on August 15, 2018 (the Decision) by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board. The RPD determined that Ms. Huang was not a Convention refugee and is not a person in need of protection. She says that the RPD committed several serious errors in...

  • Petinglay v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 1371

    [1]  Rosalyn Petinglay came to Canada in January 2016 to work as a live-in caregiver for Suzanne and Scott Henuset. Her sister Mylin is married to Scott Henuset’s brother, Michael, and Mylin works in the large liquor store that her husband manages. The store is owned by Wayne Henuset, who is the father of Scott and Michael Henuset.

  • Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd v. Crocs Canada, Inc., 2019 FC 1373

    [1]  The plaintiff and the defendants are competitors in the manufacture and sale of molded footwear made of ethylene vinyl acetate, particularly sandals and clogs.

  • Makivik Corporation v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change), 2019 FC 1297

    [1]  The Applicant, Makivik Corporation [Makivik], is seeking judicial review under section 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act, RSC, 1985, c F-7, against the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada’s [Minister] decision dated October 19, 2016. This decision varied the Nunavik Marine Region Wildlife Board’s [NMRWB] and the Eeyou Marine Region Wildlife Board’s [EMRWB] final decision...

  • Algohar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1364

    [1]  The Applicant, Mr. Younus AlGohar, is a citizen of the United Kingdom. His application for a Temporary Resident Permit [TRP] under subsection 24(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c. 27 [IRPA] was refused on the basis that he did not disclose that he had been refused a visa to the United States. After reconsideration, the refusal decision was maintained.

  • Bryan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1347

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of an Immigration Officer’s refusal of the Applicant’s Humanitarian and Compassionate (“H&C”) application under section 25(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (“the Act”).

  • Chau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1342

    [1]  The Applicant, Ying Chau, has applied for judicial review of a Canada Revenue Agency Officer’s decision to deny relief from interest that has accrued on her tax debt. Ying Chau was self-represented. She indicated that a translator was not needed and that she understood what was being said at the hearing. 

  • Free signup to view additional results