in Case Law › Federal Court
in vLex Canada

37108 results for Case Law › Federal Court

  • vLex Rating
  • Parsons Inc. v. Khan, 2021 FC 57

    [1]  The Applicant Parsons Corporation is a multinational engineering and construction firm based in the United States of America, and the owner of the trademark PARSONS [PARSONS Mark]. The Applicant Parsons Inc is a wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary of Parsons Corporation, and uses the PARSONS Mark under licence. In these reasons, I refer to the Applicants together as “Parsons”.

  • Allstaff Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 52

    [1]  This application for judicial review concerns the decision of the Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) to deny the Applicant’s request for relief from debts, interest, and penalties pursuant to subsections 153(1.1) and 220(3.1) of the Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp) (“ITA”).

  • Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2021 FC 7

    [1] - [4]

  • Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. White (Beast IPTV), 2021 FC 53

    [1]  The appellants Bell Canada, Bell Expressvu Limited Partnership, Bell Media Inc., Vidéotron S.E.N.C., Groupe TVA Inc., Rogers Communications Canada Inc. and Rogers Media 2018 FCA 42 (CanLII) Inc. (the appellants) are appealing the order of Justice Bell of the Federal Court (the Judge) dated June 29, 2017 (Justice Bell’s Order or Reasons), whereby he vacated the Anton Piller order granted by...

  • Jean Philippe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 48

    [1]  The Applicant, Jean Louis Jean Philippe, is a citizen of Haiti who fled that country for Brazil, where he obtained permanent resident status. After three years in Brazil, he came to Canada where he claimed refugee status. His claim was denied by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board and that decision was upheld on appeal by the Refugee Appeal...

  • Stukanov v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 49

    [1]  These applications for judicial review involve three decisions of the Canadian Human Rights Commission (Commission), refusing to consider complaints filed by the applicant, Mr. Stukanov.  The Commission determined that Mr. Stukanov failed to establish a link between his complaints and a prohibited ground of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act, RSC 1985, c H-6 [CHRA], and

  • Jiang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 44

    [1]  Yan Jiang claims refugee protection as a Falun Gong practitioner, asserting she fled China in 2012 after the Public Security Bureau (PSB) sought to arrest her. The Refugee Protection Division (RPD) dismissed Ms. Jiang’s claim and that of her daughter, Yueshi Xiao, finding on a balance of probabilities that Ms. Jiang “is not nor has ever been [a] Falun Gong practitioner in the People’s...

  • Zhao v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 38

    [1]  This application concerns the decision of the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) dismissing an appeal by the applicant, Ms. Yan Zhao, from an exclusion order.  The IAD denied Ms. Zhao’s request for special relief on humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) grounds pursuant to section 67(1)(c) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

  • Omotayo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 39

    [1]  Ms Oluwasola Olayinka Omotayo and her two children applied for refugee protection in Canada based on Ms Omotayo’s fear of her first husband in her home country of Nigeria. A panel of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] dismissed Ms Omotayo’s application based primarily on its finding that she could live safely in Port Harcourt (i.e. she had an Internal Flight Alternative, or IFA, in...

  • Séguin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 45

    [1]  This application for judicial review concerns the decision of Mr. Timothy Sargent (the “Deputy Head”), the Deputy Minister of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (“DFO”), determining that the Applicant’s position at the DFO is to remain classified at the AS-05 group and level (the “Decision”).

  • Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Trust for Rheumatology Research, 2021 FC 41
  • Shroub v. Canada (Citienship and Immigration), 2021 FC 34

    [1]  The Applicant, Mr. Saber Abuzaid Mekki Shroub, seeks judicial review under s. 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] of a decision rendered by the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, dismissing an appeal from a decision of the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) that he was not entitled to refugee protection...

  • Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. v. Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2021 FC 37

    [1]  This is an action under section 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations (“PMNOC Regulations”) involving three patents listed for the medicinal ingredient lurasidone hydrochloride: Canadian Patent Nos. 2,538,265, 2,696,510 and 2,814,828 (“828 Patent”).

  • Adekola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 32

    [1]  The Applicant brings this motion dated December 17, 2020 seeking an Order staying the removal of the Applicant to Nigeria. It is scheduled to take place on January 9, 2021, pending a determination by this Court of his application for leave and for judicial review of a negative Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) decision by an Officer of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada in...

  • Schillaci v. Canada (National Revenue), 2021 FC 27

    [1]  The Minister of National Revenue has a discretion to waive certain interest and penalties payable under the Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp). In 2017, Joseph Schillaci sought a waiver of interest and penalties that arose from the 1989 and 1991 taxation years. He says he was not aware of the outstanding amounts, on which interest was still accruing even though the Canada Revenue

  • Henry v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 31

    [1]  This application for judicial review concerns the decision of Mr. Peter Linklater, a Special Advisor to the Commissioner of Corrections (the “Special Advisor”), acting on behalf of the Correctional Services Canada (“CSC”), to deny the Applicant’s grievance, which claimed that information contained in his Intake Assessment Report (“IAR”) is incorrect (the “Final Grievance Decision”).

  • Adelani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 23

    [1]  The Applicants seek judicial review of the decision from the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) dated December 13, 2019, which confirmed the refusal of the refugee claim of the Applicants as they were found to be neither Convention refugees, nor persons in need of protection pursuant to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2011, c 27, ss 96–97 (1).

  • Lloyd v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 29

    [1]  This application for judicial review concerns the decision of the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) to deny the Applicant’s grievance regarding the CRA’s decision to transfer the Applicant out of her position at its Criminal Investigation Division (“CID”) due to credibility concerns.

  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Sharafaldin, 2021 FC 22

    [1]  Mahmoud Sharafaldin, the respondent in this proceeding, has applied for an order in the nature of mandamus to require the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (“the Minister”) to make a decision on his application for Canadian citizenship (Federal Court File No. T-64-19).  The citizenship application has been outstanding for over twenty years.

  • Ernst v. Canadian National Railway Company, 2021 FC 16

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of a decision by the Canadian Human Rights Commission [Commission] dated July 25, 2019 [Decision]. The Commission dismissed the Applicant’s complaint [Complaint] that his employer, Canadian National Railway Company [CN] discriminated against him by terminating his employment based on family status, contrary to section 7 of the Canadian Human...

  • Janssen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2021 FC 3
  • Janssen Inc. v. Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., 2021 FC 4
  • Janssen Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2021 FC 6
  • Janssen Inc. v. Pharmascience Inc., 2021 FC 5
  • Oyewoley v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 21

    [1]  The Applicants seek judicial review of the decision from the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) dated October 10, 2019, which confirmed the refusal of the Applicants’ refugee claim as there was a viable internal flight alternative (IFA) in Lagos, Nigeria.

  • Teva Canada Innovation v. Pharmascience Inc., 2020 FC 1158

    [1]  These proceedings involve two patent infringement actions [the Action] pursuant to subsection 6(1) of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations, SOR/93-133 [the Regulations].

  • Hailu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 15

    [1]  The Applicant, Eleni Seyoum Hailu, seeks judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] granting the Respondent’s application under section 109 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] to vacate a previous decision allowing the Applicant’s claim for refugee protection.

  • Tiller v. Canada, 2021 FC 25
  • Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Videotron Ltd., 2021 FC 19

    [1]  The issue to be determined on this motion is whether the Court should grant the request by the Defendant, Videotron Ltd. [Videotron] to reopen the evidentiary portion of the patent infringement trial to allow the parties to adduce additional expert evidence relating to the accounting of profits remedy sought by the Plaintiff, Rovi Guides, Inc. [Rovi].

  • Lutonadio v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 18

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD], which confirmed the decision of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] determining that the applicant is not a person in need of protection. This application for judicial review is made under section 72 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

  • Free signup to view additional results