Case Law

Latest documents

  • Sanders v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 616

    [1] Between March 15 and September 26, 2020, Ms. Tracy Sanders, the Applicant, received monthly payments in the amount of $2,000 for a total of seven periods (periods 1 to 7) under the Canada Emergency Response Benefit Act, SC 2020, c 5 s 8 [CERB Act].

  • Ghodsi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 620

    [1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision of an officer [Officer] of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada at the Embassy of Canada in Ankara, Turkey, dated November 17, 2022, wherein the Officer concluded that the Applicant, a citizen of Iran, had failed to meet the criteria for the issuance of a work permit under the C12 Labour Market Impact Assessment [LMIA] exemption for managerial/executive intra-company transferees pursuant to subsection 205(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 [Regulations] and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

  • Jamshidi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 627

    [1] The Applicant, Sahand Jamshidi, is a 22-year-old citizen of Iran. This is the Applicant’s third study permit application based on an admission offer from Trinity Western University to pursue undergraduate studies in Sports and Leisure Management.

  • Luk v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 623

    [1] The Applicant, a self-represented citizen of Hong Kong, China, seeks judicial review of the decision made by a visa officer [Officer] on October 6, 2022, refusing to issue a study permit to the Applicant to pursue a diploma in Baking and Pastry Arts Management at Centennial College.

  • Asli v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 610

    [1] This is an application for judicial review of the decision of an officer [Officer] of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] dated November 18, 2022 [Decision]. The Officer concluded that the Applicant, a citizen of Iran, had failed to meet the criteria for the issuance of a work permit pursuant to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2022-227 [IRPR].

  • Royston-Birbari v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 612

    [1] Ms Donna Royston-Birbari began operating a small pet-care business in 2019, just before the COVID-19 pandemic struck. During COVID, people largely stayed at home and did not need pet-care services. Her business suffered.

  • Setirekli v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2024 FC 615

    [1] The Applicant, Haci Setirekli, seeks a judicial review of an inland enforcement officer’s [Officer] decision dated May 10, 2023 refusing the Applicant’s request to defer his removal [Decision].

  • Nguyen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 609

    [1] Thanh Duy Nguyen (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of a decision of an immigration officer (the “Officer”), dated November 4, 2022. In that decision, the Officer refused the Applicant’s application for permanent residence under the spousal class. The Officer determined that the Applicant entered into the marriage primarily for the purpose of acquiring status under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (“IRPA”) and did not cohabit with his spouse.

  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 614

    [1] This is an application for judicial review to set aside a decision [Decision] of the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] dated January 18, 2023, which rejected the appeal of the Applicant, Jaspal Singh, citizen of India, and confirmed the decision of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD], in which decision the RPD determined that the Applicant was not a Convention refugee, pursuant to s. 96 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA], or person in need of protection, pursuant to s. 97 of the IRPA because an internal flight alternative [IFA] was identified in either Mumbai or Bengaluru.

  • Jalali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 603

    [1] The Principle Applicant, Sara Jalali, (“PA”) seeks judicial review of a decision made by an Immigration Officer (the “Officer”) on February 21, 2023, refusing the PA’s study permit application.

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT