in Canadian Caselaw › Federal Court
in vLex Canada

35622 results for Canadian Caselaw › Federal Court

  • vLex Rating
  • Warsame v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 920

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of a decision rendered by the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada dated August 28, 2018. The RAD dismissed the Applicant’s appeal of a decision rendered by the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] and confirmed the RPD’s finding that the Applicant is neither a Convention Refugee nor a person in need of...

  • Tung v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 917

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of a removal order made by a Minister’s Delegate dated December 11, 2018. The Applicant is a citizen of China born in 1955. In 2001, she came to Canada and made a claim for refugee protection. In 2002, she obtained convention refugee status. On May 12, 2004, she became a permanent resident of Canada. Between 2004 and 2014 or so, she applied...

  • Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 915

    [1]  The Applicant seeks judicial review of the decision by an officer of Citizen and Immigration Canada [CIC Officer] rendered on May 18, 2018 [Decision], denying the Applicant’s application for a Temporary Resident Permit [TRP] pursuant to section 24(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

  • Louis v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 906

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] of a decision rendered by a member of the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD], who confirmed the decision of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] which found that the Applicant is neither a Convention refugee under section 96 of the IRPA, nor a person...

  • DLE v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 909

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of the decision by the Appeal Division of the Parole Board of Canada [Appeal Division] dated February 4, 2019, dismissing the Applicant’s appeal and upholding the decision by the Parole Board of Canada [Board] to revoke the Applicant’s full parole.

  • Tejuoso v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 903

    [1]  The applicant, Olabimpe Salamat Tejuoso, is a citizen of Nigeria.  She sought refugee protection in Canada on the basis that she had a well-founded fear of persecution in Nigeria because she is bisexual.  The Refugee Protection Division [RPD] of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada [IRB] rejected her claim.  The applicant appealed this decision to the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD

  • Zheng v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 904

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] of the Immigration and Refugee Board which found that the Applicant is not a Convention refugee or person in need of protection pursuant to ss 96 and 97, respectively, of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

  • Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 899

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] of a decision by the Immigration Division [ID] of the Immigration and Refugee Board, dated October 16, 2018, to issue a deportation order against the Applicant. This order was based on a determination that the Applicant is inadmissible to Canada...

  • Moffat v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 896

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review under subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [the IRPA] of a Refugee Protection Division [RPD] decision dated July 3, 2018 [the Decision]. The RPD determined that the Applicant would not be subject to risk of persecution, danger of torture, risk to her life or risk of cruel and unusual treatment or...

  • CHERYL TILLER, MARY-ELLEN COPLAND AND DAYNA ROACH v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, 2019 FC 895

    [1]  This is a motion for certification, on consent, for purposes of settlement under Rule 334.16 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106. The motion also seeks the appointment of the representative plaintiffs, Cheryl Tiller, Mary-Ellen Copland and Dayna Roach, approval of the Notice Plan to inform proposed class members of the settlement, their rights thereunder, the date of the settlement

  • Laag v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 890

    [1]  Abdiasis Abdullahi Laag seeks judicial review of a decision of the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] of the Immigration and Refugee Board [IRB]. The RAD determined that Mr. Laag is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in need of protection pursuant to ss 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

  • Reusable Bag Industries Pty Ltd v. Gaisin, 2019 FC 882

    [1]  This is an appeal brought by Reusable Bag Industries Pty Ltd (RBI) under ss. 56(1) of the Trade-marks Act, RSC, 1985, c T-13 (Act) from a decision of the Registrar of Trademarks (Registrar) expunging Canadian Registration No. TMA 791,496 (the Mark) on the basis of non-use.  RBI also seeks relief under ss. 56(1) of the Act for the Court to hear the appeal, notwithstanding the fact that...

  • Waked v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 885

    [1]  The applicant, Mr. Waked, is a citizen of Lebanon. His spousal sponsorship application was refused, the Citizenship and Immigration Canada Officer [Officer] having concluded his marriage was not genuine.

  • Agbai v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 886

    [1]  The Applicant, Ms. Kelechi B. Agbai, is a citizen of Nigeria. On or about September 26, 2017, she submitted her Express Entry profile to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC]. Her profile indicated that she had an offer of employment in Canada accompanied by a positive Labour Market Impact Assessment [LMIA] valid until October 19, 2017. She was accepted in the Express...

  • Dionne v. Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, 2019 FC 879

    [1]  This is an application under subsection 77(1) of the Official Languages Act, RSC 1984, c 31 (4th Supp.) [OLA] by the Applicant in response to a final investigation follow-up report [Follow-up Report], in docket 2010-0783, issued by the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages [OCOL] in March 2015.

  • Alexander v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 881

    [1]  The applicant, Ms. Nesha Margaret Alexander, is a citizen of Grenada who applied for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate [H&C] grounds. A Senior Immigration Officer [Officer] refused the application, and she now seeks judicial review of that decision under subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27.

  • Davidson v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 877

    [1]  Ray Davidson—a federal employee and a self-represented litigant—had good intentions. He went to great lengths and devoted considerable time to raise an issue of public importance: namely, questions of systemic discrimination in the federal recruitment process.

  • Sooroojebally v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 875

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of the decision of a migration counsellor with the High Commissioner of Canada, Immigration Section, in Sri Lanka [Officer], refusing the Applicant’s permanent residence application, made in the Federal Skilled Worker Class, and finding that the Applicant was inadmissible to Canada for misrepresentation pursuant to s 40(1)(a) of the...

  • Vangor v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 866

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review by the Applicant, pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 of a decision of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD], dated October 18, 2018, rejecting the Applicant’s refugee claim [Decision].

  • Lim v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 871

    [1]  The applicant, Mr. Lim, is a citizen of the Philippines who initially entered Canada on a valid work permit. His subsequent application for a Temporary Resident Visa [TRV] was refused based on serious criminality and misrepresentation. He represents himself in this application.

  • Lakatos v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 864

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review of a decision by a Senior Immigration Officer at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [the Officer] dated July 31, 2018, which denied the Applicants’ application for a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment [the Decision].

  • Osmani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 872

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review by the Applicant, pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] of the refusal by an immigration officer [Officer] of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC], to issue the Applicant a temporary resident permit [TRP]. The Decision is dated September 25, 2018 [Decision].

  • Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 870

    [1]  Mr. Yaochun Zhang is the principal applicant in this matter, and Xuchen Zhang is his son. They are citizens of China. Mr. Zhang reports that he fears persecution in China as he has three other sons and is therefore in violation of China’s Family Planning Policy [FPP].

  • Dehghani v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 873

    [1]  The applicant, Mohsen Dehghani, was born in Iran in August 1982.  He has been a permanent resident of Canada since January 2000.

  • Ward v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 863

    [1]  This judgment applies to three applications for judicial review under subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (“IRPA”) of decisions by an International Migration Officer (“Officer”) at the Embassy of Canada in Beirut, Lebanon, dated May 24, 2018.

  • Lin v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2019 FC 862

    [1]  Each of these applications arises from a similar set of facts involving allegations of misrepresentation.  Because of that similarity and the common legal issues that have been presented to the Court, this single set of reasons applies to all of the above applications.

  • Ghazi v. Canada (National Revenue), 2019 FC 860

    [1]  The Minister of National Revenue is asking the Court to strike Mr. Sina Ghazi’s application for judicial review, in which Mr. Ghazi alleges that the Canada Revenue Agency [CRA] assessment officers were biased in assessing his tax liability. According to the Minister, this application is a veiled attack on the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tax Court of Canada to assess a taxpayer’s...

  • Gordon v. Canada, 2019 FC 853

    [1]  In these proceedings, Allan Jay Gordon, James A. Deacur and Associates Ltd. [JAD] and James Allan Deacur seek damages from the Government of Canada based on pleaded allegations of tortious conduct arising out of a Canada Revenue Agency [CRA] criminal investigation.  That investigation began in late 1995 and culminated in the indictment and prosecution of Messrs. Deacur and Gordon on...

  • Lopez Gallo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 857

    [1]  This is an application for judicial review by the Applicant, pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] of a rejected application for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate grounds [H&C] made by a senior immigration officer [Officer], dated March 28, 2018 [Decision].

  • Lin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 854

    [1]  This application judicially reviews a decision [Decision] of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] which found that the Applicants are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection.  For the reasons that follow, this application for judicial review is dismissed.

  • Free signup to view additional results