Canada (Federal)

89623 results for Canada (Federal)

  • Saini v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 758

    [1] The Applicants are a family from India: Anil Saini (Principal Applicant) and his wife Manav Saini (Associate Applicant) as well as their two children. They seek judicial review of the decision of the Refugee Appeal Division (“RAD”) that dismissed their appeal and found that they had a viable Internal Flight Alternative (“IFA”) in India.

  • Canada v. Wimmer Brook Enterprises Inc., 2024 FC 765

    [1] The Plaintiff, His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, brings this motion for summary judgment. It seeks to recover the amount of $383,756.63, plus interest and costs, against the Defendants, claiming that they are in default of their repayment obligations for funds received from the Advance Payment Program under the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act, SC 1997, c 20 [the AMPA].

  • Letourneau v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 760

    [1] The Applicant seeks judicial review of a second review decision made by an officer [Officer] of the Canada Revenue Agency [CRA] dated November 9, 2022. The Officer determined that the Applicant was not eligible for the $8,000 in Canada Emergency Response Benefit [CERB] payments he received pursuant to the Canada Emergency Response Benefit Act, SC 2020, c 5, s 8 [CERB Act] for the periods from

  • Elder v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 763

    [1] The Applicant, Christopher Elder [the Applicant], is an inmate currently serving a life sentence at a minimum-security prison in Alberta. The events at issue on this application relate to a time when the Applicant was in custody at Bowden Institution. The Applicant filed a grievance under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, SC 1992, c. 20 [CCRA] after his escorted temporary absences [

  • Torres Pena v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 756

    [1] The applicants are citizens of Colombia. They have been directed to report for removal from Canada on May 19, 2024. On May 7, 2024, they asked the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) to defer their removal. In a decision dated May 14, 2024, a CBSA Inland Enforcement Officer refused their request. The applicants have applied for leave and for judicial review of this decision. They now seek an

  • R. v. Lozada, 2024 SCC 18

    [1]                             The appellants, Emanuel Lozada and Victor Ramos, appeal as of right to this Court under s. 691(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. The majority of the Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed their appeals from jury...

  • Naserikarimvand v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 757

    [1] The Applicant, Danial Naserikarimvand, seeks judicial review of the decision of a visa officer denying his application for a study permit. Mr. Naserikarimvand had applied for a study permit to pursue a Masters in Business Administration [MBA] program at Trinity Western University [TWU]. The Officer concluded that Mr. Naserikarimvand’s proposed program did not appear reasonable given his...

  • Ajdadi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 754

    [1] The Applicant seeks judicial review of an Officer’s decision denying her a study permit. She submits that the decision is unreasonable because the Officer failed to engage with the evidence she submitted, and therefore the reasons are not transparent and intelligible.

  • Malik v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 755

    [1] In my view, the Decision is reasonable. It was open and justified for the Officer to find that the Applicant has significant family ties in Canada and none outside of Canada because the entirety of the Applicant’s immediate family resides in Canada, and the only family the Applicant has outside of Canada is their extended family in Pakistan.

  • Ojo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 752

    [1] The Applicant, Anjolaoluwa Ojo, a minor, applied to study for a social worker diploma at Georgian College in Ontario. An officer at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] refused her application, finding that she had not established that she would leave Canada at the end of her authorized stay.

  • Algazal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 753

    [1] The Applicant, Abdulmoulla Algazal, a citizen of Libya, has lived in Canada for approximately 15 years. His siblings and their families have permanent status in Canada. Mr. Algazal applied for permanent residence on the basis of humanitarian and compassionate grounds [H & C Application]. An officer at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] refused his application on February 2

  • Obasi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 746

    [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by a visa Officer [Officer] denying the Applicant’s application for a study permit. In their decision dated February 3, 2023 [the Decision], the Officer denied the Applicant’s application on the grounds that her assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel, and because the Officer was not...

  • Mushing v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 750

    [1] The Applicant seeks judicial review of a decision to deny his request for a disability award entitlement. More specifically, this application concerns a decision of an Entitlement Appeal Panel of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board (the “VRAB Panel”). In that decision, the VRAB Panel affirmed a decision of the Entitlement Review Panel of the Board, which in turn, had affirmed the decision of

  • Zhuang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 749

    [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB). The RAD dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Refugee Protection Division (RPD), finding that the Applicants are not Convention refugees or persons in need of protection under section 96 and subsection 97(1) of the Immigration and Refugee

  • Carter v. The King, 2024 TCC 71

    [1] These appeals concern the application of section 84.1 of the Income Tax Act to the sale of shares in a family business.

  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Public Service Alliance of Canada, 2024 FCA 95

    [1] Dental benefits are one of the employment benefits available to government employees, including members of the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), and their eligible dependants. These benefits are governed by the Public Service Dental Care Plan (the Dental Plan), the terms of which are negotiated by the parties from time to time.

  • Kaur v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 735

    [1] Under section 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act [IRPA], Balvir Kaur, Paramjit Singh, Navreet Reet Kaur and Akashdeep Singh (together, the “Applicants”), are seeking a Judicial Review of the rejection of their refugee protection appeal by the Refugee Appeal Division [“RAD”] of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada [“IRB”]. The Judicial Review is dismissed for the...

  • Katoch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 744

    [1] The Applicant is a Veterinary Pathologist at the Canadian Food Inspection Agency [CFIA] and a member of the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada [Institute]. The Applicant initiated a workplace harassment complaint under CFIA’s Work Place Harassment and Violence Prevention Policy and pursuant to section 15 of the Work Place Harassment and Violence Prevention Regulations, SOR/

  • Khodykin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FCA 96

    [1] The applicant, Alexey Khodykin, applies for judicial review of the decision of the Appeal Division of the Social Security Tribunal dated August 31, 2023.

  • Canada (Attorney General) v. MacDonald, 2024 FC 716
  • Ahmadiyya Abode of Peace Inc. v. The King, 2024 TCC 70

    [1] The Appellant, Ahmadiyya Abode of Peace Inc., based in North York, operates a 166-unit non-profit housing project, and participates in a municipal housing stability service program. The Appellant is not a registrant under the federal Excise Tax Act (Act).

  • Ho v. Canada, 2024 FCA 94

    [1] The appellant appeals from an Order dated November 4, 2022 of the Federal Court (per Bell J.), dismissing the appellant’s motion for an extension of time to appeal two Federal Court orders. In one, the Federal Court dismissed the appellant’s motion for waiver of court fees. In the other, the Federal Court struck the appellant’s statement of claim without leave to amend.

  • Canadian Energy Services L.P. v. Commissioner of Patents, 2024 FC 742

    [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Patents (the “Commissioner”). The decision varied the records of Canadian Patent 2,624,834 (the “834 Patent” or the “Patent”) in light of the judgment and reasons of this Court in matter T-1534-20 (the “2023 Court Decision”).

  • Edalat v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 738

    [1] The Applicant, Sharareh Edalat, applied for a work permit as a self-employed business owner. An officer at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] refused her application on November 17, 2022. Ms. Edalat challenges this refusal on judicial review. I am dismissing the judicial review because I do not find that Ms. Edalat has established that the decision was unreasonable or made in

  • Momand v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 737

    [1] The Applicant, Nasratullah Momand, applied for permanent residence in Canada based on humanitarian and compassionate factors [H & C Application]. An officer at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] refused his application. Mr. Momand challenges this refusal on judicial review.

  • Gutierrez v. Canada, 2024 FCA 93

    [1] The applicant seeks, through two distinct motions, an extension of time to appeal two Orders made by the Federal Court in file number T-1731-22.

  • Holita v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 731
  • James v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 730

    [1] The Applicant seeks judicial review of three decisions dated August 30, 2023 made by a Canada Revenue Agency [CRA] officer [Officer] determining that the Applicant was not eligible for the following benefits: the Canada Recovery Benefit [CRB], the Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit [CRSB], and the Canada Worker Lockdown Benefit [CWLB].

  • Canada (National Revenue) v. Schreiber, 2024 FC 729

    [1] The Minister of National Revenue (the Applicant or the Minister) seeks a compliance order under section 231.7 of the Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp) as amended [ITA], requiring Jürgen Schreiber (the Respondent) to provide the Applicant with documents and information sought from him pursuant to a demand issued on July 5, 2022.

  • Abiola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 724

    [1] The Applicants ask the Court to review and set aside a decision of the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] finding that they are neither Convention refugees nor persons in need of protection under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [the Act] because they have an internal flight alternative [IFA] in Abuja, Nigeria.

  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT