Canada (Federal)

89414 results for Canada (Federal)

  • French v. The Royal Canadian Legion (Dominion Command), 2024 FCA 63

    [1] This appeal concerns the scope of the defence provided by subsection 64(2) of the Copyright Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-42, against allegations of infringement of copyright and moral rights. Subsection 64(2) reads as follows:

  • Moronfulu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 488

    [1] The Applicants are Olubukola Omowonuola Moronfolu, and two of her three children. Ms. Moronfolu came to Canada with her three children, where they all made claims for refugee protection. The Refugee Protection Division [RPD] denied the refugee claim of Ms. Moronfolu and two of her three children. The RPD granted the refugee claim of Ms. Moronfolu’s eldest daughter, now 18, finding that

  • Yurtgul v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2024 FC 481

    [1] Mr. Ibrahim Yurtgul (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board, Refugee Protection Division (the “RPD”), allowing an application by the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness (the “Respondent”) to cease refugee protection.

  • Dogahen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 486

    [1] Mr. Seyed Mohammad Mousavi Dogahen (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board, Refugee Protection Division (the “RPD”), dated October 18, 2022. In that decision, the RPD determined that the Applicant was no longer a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection, pursuant to paragraph 108(1)(a) of the...

  • Friessen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 485

    [1] The Applicants are Mexican citizens. They are a Mennonite family who seek refugee protection in Canada, alleging increased criminal gang and cartel violence in Mennonite communities in Mexico.

  • Flores v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 480

    [1] The Principal Applicant, a citizen of Germany and Mexico, and her two children [Minor Applicants], seek judicial review of a decision of a Senior Immigration Officer dated February 16, 2023, refusing their application for permanent residence from within Canada on humanitarian and compassionate [H&C] grounds under section 25(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [I

  • Alabi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 475

    [1] The Applicants seek judicial review of a decision by a Senior Immigration Officer (“Officer”) dated February 2, 2023, denying the Applicants’ Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (“PRRA”) application, pursuant to section 112 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (“IRPA”). The Officer was not satisfied that the Applicants would be...

  • T.C.S.T. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 473

    [1] The Applicant, T.C.S.T (the “Applicant”), is seeking a Judicial Review in respect of a decision dated on November 21, 2022, rendered by the Investigator PRD of the Passport Entitlement and Investigations Division Domestic Network [PEID], refusing to issue a passport in the Applicant’s name (the “Decision”). Pursuant to an earlier confidentiality order of...

  • Nyam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 469

    [1] The applicant claims to be Nyamusa Jessy Nyam, a 61-year-old citizen of the Republic of Cameroon. She sought refugee protection in Canada on the basis of her fear of persecution as a supporter of the Anglophone resistance movement in Cameroon.

  • Ma v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 471

    [1] The Applicant, Ma, Yanling, is a citizen of China. The Applicant claims refugee protection on the basis of fear of persecution at the hands of Chinese authorities for having protested against asserted under-compensation for land expropriation involving her pig farm business and those of her neighbours.

  • Hossain v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 477

    [1] The Applicant, a citizen of Bangladesh, arrived in Canada in March of 2017 and made a refugee claim on the basis that he was targeted in Bangladesh as a result of his membership in the Bangladesh Nationalist Party [BNP]. In August of 2018, the Refugee Protection Division determined that he was a Convention refugee and in December of 2018, the Applicant submitted an application for permanent...

  • Medexus Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Accord Healthcare Inc., 2024 FC 424

    [1] In this patent action the plaintiffs seek remedies for the defendants’ alleged infringement of Canadian Patent No 2,659,662 titled “Concentrated Methotrexate Solutions” (662 Patent). The opening paragraph of the 662 Patent states:

  • Asije v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 479

    [1] Ms. Esther Igbohime Asije (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of an officer (the “Officer”), refusing her application for an extension of her visitor record, pursuant to subsection 181(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations, SOR/2002-227 (the “Regulations”).

  • Zhang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 464

    [1] Mr. Jiakang Zhang (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board, Refugee Appeal Division (the “RAD”). In that decision, the RAD confirmed the decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board, Refugee Protection Division (the “RPD”), finding that the Applicant is neither a Convention refugee nor a person in...

  • Obadina-Okoro v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 468

    [1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by a visa officer [Officer], dated August 4, 2022 [the Decision], in which the Officer refused the Applicant’s study permit application.

  • Molla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 459

    [1] The applicant, Mohammad Shah Jahan Molla, seeks judicial review of a visa officer’s decision that refused his application for permanent residence. The officer found Mr. Molla is inadmissible to Canada under paragraph 35(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] for committing an act outside Canada that constitutes an offence under sections 4 to 7 of the...

  • Ali v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2024 FC 466

    [1] This is a judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] of the Immigration and Refugee Board, dated March 10, 2023 [Decision], allowing the Minister’s application to vacate the Applicant’s Convention refugee protection pursuant to section 109 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

  • Canada (National Revenue) v. Ghermezian, 2024 FC 463

    [1] These proceedings involve six applications by the Minister of National Revenue [the Minister], seeking compliance orders under s 231.7 of the Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c 1 (5th Supp) [the Act]. The Respondents are five individuals, all members of the Ghermezian extended family, and a related corporation, Gherfam Equities Inc. Each of the Minister’s applications seeks to compel the...

  • McDowell v. A Drip of Honey, 2024 FC 453

    [1] The Plaintiff brings an ex parte motion in writing under Rule 369 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 [the Rules], seeking an order, pursuant to Rule 210(1), for default judgment against the Defendant, A Drip of Honey.

  • Hudson v. Canada, 2024 FCA 62

    [1] In the present appeal from a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada, the appellant moves for an Order that:

  • Mirzayev v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 449

    [1] The Applicant seeks judicial review of the decision of the Refugee Appeal Division that dismissed his refugee claim because he had a viable Internal Flight Alternative (“IFA”).

  • Lozano Orjuela v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 450

    [1] The hearing in this matter was held on March 20, 2024. The Applicant did not attend, despite efforts by the Registry to contact him both by email and telephone. The Applicant’s counsel was also previously granted an Order to be removed from the file, because of his inability to communicate with his client.

  • Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 457

    [1] The Applicant, Rasamalar Kanthasamy, is a citizen of Sri Lanka. Originally arriving in Canada on a “super visa” to visit her daughters who were sponsored to Canada by their spouses, the Applicant later claimed protection on the bases of: (i) being perceived by the army as a supporter of the (anti-government) Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam [LTTE]; (ii) Tamil ethnicity; and (iii)

  • The King v. Hudson, 2024 FCA 61

    [1] Canada moves under subsection 397(2) of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 (the Rules), to have the Court set aside the parts of the Judgments and Reasons for Judgment, dated February 20, 2024, ordering them to pay costs, and to substitute the words “without costs” for the existing words “with costs”.

  • Canada (National Revenue) v. Chad, 2024 FC 460

    [1] The Minister of National Revenue [Applicant] has filed a summary application pursuant to section 231.7 of the Income Tax Act, RSC 1985 c 1 (5th Supp) [Act] for a compliance order requiring S. Robert Chad [Respondent] to provide information to the Applicant pursuant to sections 231.1 and 231.2 of the Act. The Respondent is associated with the following non-resident corporations or trusts,...

  • Wepruk v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FCA 55

    [1] The applicant seeks judicial review of a decision of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board, 2021 FPSLREB 75 (Board Reasons). The Board dismissed the applicant’s grievance, upholding the employer’s termination decision.

  • Yan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 448

    [1] This judicial review application arises out of a decision of a Senior Immigration Officer [Officer] denying the Applicant’s Pre-Removal Risk Assessment [PRRA] application pursuant to section 112 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA]. In his 2022 PRRA application, the Applicant claimed that, as an evangelical Christian, he would be at risk of harm under...

  • Pilarski v. Canada, 2024 FCA 60

    [1] The appellant, Joseph Pilarski, appeals the Tax Court of Canada’s April 28, 2022 procedural order (per Bocock, J) in Tax Court File 2015-355(IT)G. That order adjourned the oral hearing of the respondent’s motion to quash the appellant’s appeal, and ordered that the motion be determined based on written representations. That is, the Tax Court’s order changed the...

  • Sinclair v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FCA 57

    [1] Mr. Sinclair, a Crown prosecutor in Whitehorse, Yukon, applied to the Public Service Commission of Canada (the PSC) on January 5, 2021 for permission to seek the nomination as (and if successful to be) a candidate in the 2021 Yukon territorial election. On March 16, 2021, the PSC denied Mr. Sinclair’s request.

  • Chad v. Canada (National Revenue), 2024 FCA 56

    [1] This decision comes in the context of an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court (2023 FC 1481, per Justice Martine St-Louis) that struck, without leave to amend, an amended notice of application filed by the appellant, S. Robert Chad. The Federal Court found that the application was so clearly improper as to be bereft of any possibility of success.

  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT