Canada (Federal)

[1] This is an application for an order in the nature of mandamus brought pursuant to subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27. The Applicant is a citizen of China. On September 28, 2020, she applied as a dependent applicant under the Federal Self-Employed Permanent Residence application of her husband, who is the principal applicant [Principal Applicant]. The

[1] The Applicant Chin Kiu Lee is a Chinese national from Hong Kong who came to Canada in 2006. He married his first wife in 2007 and obtained permanent residence in Canada in 2009 through spousal sponsorship. The couple later divorced in 2012.

[1] In a decision dated April 4, 2023, the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] allowed the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness’s [Minister] application for cessation of Mr. Roman Slepcsik’s refugee status under paragraph 108(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA]. The RPD found the Applicant had voluntarily reavailed himself of the protection of...

[1] The Applicant, Fadumo Yusuf Mohamed Abdille [Applicant], came to Canada in 2012 and was granted refugee status. Her status was vacated in 2023 due to misrepresentation on her refugee claim. As she was married to a Canadian citizen, the Applicant applied for permanent residency under the Spouse or Common-Law Partner in Canada Class pursuant to section 12(1) of the Immigration and Refugee...

[1] In May 2019, Service Canada, acting on behalf of the Minister of Employment and Social Development, sent a letter to the appellant, Arnold Abramowitz, advising him that he would be automatically enrolled for the old age security (OAS) pension under the Old Age Security Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. O-9 (OAS Act), with payments to commence in June 2020. That letter explained that the appellant had the...

[1] The Applicant is a citizen of India who seeks judicial review of the refusal of his application for a work permit to work as a truck driver in British Columbia. The Applicant has experience as a truck driver from employment in Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE).

[1] The applicant, Chioma Blessed Nwosu, seeks judicial review of a decision dated November 28, 2024 [Decision] whereby the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] dismissed her appeal and confirmed the Refugee Protection Division’s [RPD] decision. Ms. Nwosu’s claim for refugee protection under sections 96 and 97 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] was rejected because both...

[1] The Applicants, Major Singh, his wife Balvir Kaur, and their son Sahildeep Singh seek judicial review under subsection 72(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA] of the decision dated November 29, 2024 [the Decision] by a senior Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship [IRCC] officer [the Officer] rejecting the Applicants’ application for permanent residence based...

[1] This is an application for judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] of the Immigration and Refugee Board dated March 27, 2024 [Decision] which refused the Applicant’s claim for refugee protection. The Applicant was found not credible such that the RPD held the Applicant had not established he was either a Convention refugee or a person in need of protection...

[1] This declaratory decision concerns the governance structure of the Blueberry River First Nations (BRFN or Nation). BRFN is a band under the Indian Act, RSC 1985, c I-5 in the province of British Columbia.

[1] A Senior Immigration Officer [Officer] denied Mr. Jassa Singh Gill’s [the Applicant] application for a recognition of criminal rehabilitation, such that his inadmissibility for serious criminality under paragraph 36(1)(b) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [Act] would be overcome [Decision]. The Applicant seeks judicial review of this Decision on the grounds that it...

[1] The principal Applicant, Shengyong Wang, her husband, Erkang Lin, and their daughter, Jiayi Lin, are citizens of the People’s Republic of China. They seek a writ of mandamus to compel the Respondent to make a decision regarding their applications for permanent residence [PR applications] as part of the Economic class of the Québec Business Category [QBC], which were filed 7 years prior.

[1] The Applicants are a married couple who filed refugee claims in Canada based on their fear of the police in India. The Refugee Protection Division (“RPD”) refused their claims, and the Refugee Appeal Division (“RAD”) upheld the refusal. The Applicants are challenging the RAD’s refusal on judicial review.

[1] The Applicant, Fred Nnamdi Nzegwu, seeks judicial review of the May 22, 2024 decision [Decision] of the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD] confirming the refusal of his refugee claim by the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] that had previously found he failed to establish the facts underlying his claim with credible and trustworthy evidence. The RAD rejected Mr. Nzegwu’s refugee claim on the basis

[1]

[1]                              Like its companion case, R. v. Rousselle, 2025 SCC 35, this appeal relates to the interpretation of s. 320.31(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46. The provision forms part of the evidentiary scheme for...

[1] The Applicant, Ms. Tanisha, seeks judicial review of a decision that denied her request for reconsideration of a refusal to restore her temporary status in Canada.

[1] Mr. Aniket Maheshwari (the “Applicant”) seeks judicial review of the decision of the Canada Revenue Agency (the “CRA”), made on July 5, 2024, whereby he was found ineligible for receipt of benefits under the Canada Recovery Benefits Act (S.C. 2020, c. 12, s. 2) (the “Act”).

[1] The Court is seized with what could be identified as the second round of litigation between these parties.

[1] The Applicant, Salim Ahmed Bathia, applied for authorization to return to Canada (“ARC”) under subsection 52(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 (“IRPA”) on March 11, 2022, to visit his brother and two nieces who are Canadian citizens. A departure order was previously issued against the Applicant in 1997 after he abandoned his refugee claim in Canada.

[1] The Applicant seeks judicial of a visa officer’s [the Officer] decision [the Decision] that refused his temporary resident visa application and found him inadmissible to enter Canada for a period of five years for misrepresentation pursuant to subsections 40(1) and (2) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, SC 2001, c 27 [IRPA].

[1] By motion dated September 24, 2025, the Plaintiff, His Majesty the King in Right of Canada, seeks an order for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 213(1) of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 [Rules] against the Defendants, 101137743 Saskatchewan Ltd. [Corporate Defendant] and Raymond Jed Hemming, for the outstanding loan amount advanced to the Corporate Defendant under the Agricultural...

[1] The Applicant, Nadera Patang (Ms. Patang) challenges a January 30, 2024 decision (Decision) by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) confirming that she owes $3,000 to the CRA. Ms. Patang received two $2,000 Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) payments for which she was ineligible between March 15, 2020 and May 9, 2020, and repaid $1,000.

[1] The Applicant seeks judicial review of a January 15, 2025, second review decision [the Decision] made by a Canada Revenue Agency [CRA] administrative decision maker [the Decision Maker] on behalf of the Minister of National Revenue [the Minister] to refuse to waive or cancel any part of the penalties and interest that arise from the Applicant’s assessments for the fiscal years ending December

[1] The Applicant, Mr. Sameer Ebadi, failed to file “T1135 Foreign Income Verification Statement” forms (“T1135”) for his 2021 and 2022 taxation years. By the time he filed the forms in July 2023, it was past the deadline, and he was subject to late filing penalties and arrears interest.

[1] This is an application by a Palestinian family living in Gaza City in the context of the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza which persists notwithstanding the recent ceasefire agreement and the continued closure of the Rafah border crossing into Egypt. This application is for judicial review of the alleged failure of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] to process the...

[1] This is an application brought by a Palestinian family living in the Gaza Strip in the context of the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza which persists notwithstanding the recent ceasefire agreement and the continued closure of the Rafah border crossing into Egypt. The family applied for judicial review of the alleged failure of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] to process

[1] This is an application brought by a Palestinian male living in the Gaza Strip in the context of the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza which persists notwithstanding the recent ceasefire agreement and the continued closure of the Rafah border crossing into Egypt, for judicial review of the alleged failure of Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada [IRCC] to process his application in a

[1] Barry Dusome and Wyatt Dusome [the Appellants], seek judicial review of a decision dated May 29, 2024 [the Decision] of the Commissioner of Patents [the Commissioner] refusing their application for a patent for a “Method of Playing a Card Game” (Canadian Patent Application Number 2,701,028) [the 028 Application]. The Commissioner refused the 028 Application on the basis that the actual...