Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
- Edmonton (City) v Andrews,
- R v Eau Claire Distillery Ltd,
-
R v CW,
Sexual assault. Credibility of a witness. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Reliability concerns. Absolute certainty
-
R v Selby,
Elements of the offence of sexual exploitation require evidence. Specific communications. Young person. Position of trust
-
R v Sailer,
Safety of travelers aboard civil aircraft. Expert opinion evidence in the disciplines of general medicine. Reasonable care. Crew member
-
R v KMJ,
Sexual assault. Standard of proof in a criminal trial. Mistake of law. Implied consent. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Reasonable steps
-
Heidt v Pirlot,
Parenting time. Family law act. Interests of the children
-
R v Blackhorse,
Circumstantial evidence. Reasonable doubt. Lawful excuse. Aggravated assault. Police officer
-
R v Wadden,
Criminal law. General intent offence. Imitation firearm. Public peace
-
R v Abdullahi,
Videotape evidence. Aggravated assault. Reasonable doubt. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Medical clinic
-
R v CJN,
Criminal record for sexual offences. Credibility of the witness. Evidence given. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Punishment of imprisonment for a term
- Akamihk Child and Family Services Society v Alberta (Minister of Justice and Solicitor General),
- R v Abdullahi,
-
Akamihk Child and Family Services Society v Alberta (Minister of Justice and Solicitor General),
Protections of the duty of fairness in the administrative law context. Fatality inquiry. Jurisdiction by necessary implication. Legal costs. Legal counsel
-
R v Laboucan,
Guilty plea. Sentencing hearing
-
Fediuk v Hamblin,
Family support. Family members. Parenting conflict over a single child. Personality disorder. Interim order
- Fediuk v Hamblin,
- R v Laboucan,
-
Alberta (Child, Youth and Family Enhancement Act, Director) v AM,
Principles of fundamental justice in the context of a child protection hearing. Need of intervention. Mental health. Interim supervision order
- Auger v Lamouche,
-
Auger v Lamouche,
Family support. Liberal access. Relationship with potential danger for the children. Litigation over parenting. Current partner. Final order
-
R v Braimi,
[1] Integrity is the fundamental quality of any person who seeks to practice as a member of the legal profession. If a client has any doubt about his or her lawyer’s trustworthiness, the essential element in the true lawyer-client relationship will be missing. If integrity is lacking, the lawyer’s usefulness to the client and...
- R v Braimi,
-
R v Perez,
Sentences for sexual interference with children. Lack of a criminal record. Offences against children. Position of trust
-
Walker v Low,
Apprehension of bias. Variation of parenting trial. Condition precedent. Adjudicative function
- Walker v Low,
-
R v Chisholm,
Custodial sentence. Appropriate sentence. Aggravated assault. Criminal record. Offenders for similar offences
-
Gallant v Whiteway,
Income after pension deductions. Undue hardship. Guideline support. Practical limits
- Gallant v Whiteway,
- R v Chisholm,