British Columbia (Technology, Innovation and Citizens’ Services) v. Columbus Real Estate Inc., 2017 BCCA 365
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Garson |
| Date | 17 October 2017 |
| Citation | 2017 BCCA 365 |
| Docket Number | CA44523 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
British Columbia (Technology, Innovation and Citizens’ Services) v. Columbus Real Estate Inc., 2018 BCCA 340
...in chambers seeking directions with respect to the application to dismiss the appeal on grounds of mootness. In reasons indexed as 2017 BCCA 365, the chambers judge directed that the mootness argument proceed at the same time as the hearing of the The Mootness Application [45] The defendant......
-
Coburn and Watson's Metropolitan Home v. Home Depot of Canada Inc., 2019 BCCA 35
...of timing.” (At para. 7; see also British Columbia (Technology, Innovation and Citizens’ Services) v. Columbus Real Estate Inc. 2017 BCCA 365 at para. The Defendants’ Response [30] This brings me to the arguments in response made by counsel for the representative plaintiff and the defendant......
2 cases
-
British Columbia (Technology, Innovation and Citizens’ Services) v. Columbus Real Estate Inc., 2018 BCCA 340
...in chambers seeking directions with respect to the application to dismiss the appeal on grounds of mootness. In reasons indexed as 2017 BCCA 365, the chambers judge directed that the mootness argument proceed at the same time as the hearing of the The Mootness Application [45] The defendant......
-
Coburn and Watson's Metropolitan Home v. Home Depot of Canada Inc., 2019 BCCA 35
...of timing.” (At para. 7; see also British Columbia (Technology, Innovation and Citizens’ Services) v. Columbus Real Estate Inc. 2017 BCCA 365 at para. The Defendants’ Response [30] This brings me to the arguments in response made by counsel for the representative plaintiff and the defendant......