0940460 BC Ltd. v. Burnaby (City), 2020 BCCA 142
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Saunders; The Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie; The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Case Date | May 20, 2020 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2020 BCCA 142 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
North Cowichan (Municipality) v. 1909988 Ontario Limited,
...an estoppel against the proper interpretation of a bylaw: Langley (Township) v. Wood, 1999 BCCA 260; 0940460 BC Ltd. v. Burnaby (City), 2020 BCCA 142 at paras. 36, 40–44. If there were any doubt about the matter, it is resolved in this case by s. 490(5) of the LGA which expressly pro......
-
Taylor v. Vancouver (City),
...public nature that they cannot be waived, lost, or vitiated by mere acquiescence: Langley at para. 12; 0940460 BC Ltd. v. Burnaby (City), 2020 BCCA 142 at para. 42 [Burnaby]; Corporation of the Township of Esquimalt v. Crosson, 2010 BCSC 1490 at para. 43 [Esquimalt]. Moreover, the fact that......
2 cases
-
North Cowichan (Municipality) v. 1909988 Ontario Limited,
...an estoppel against the proper interpretation of a bylaw: Langley (Township) v. Wood, 1999 BCCA 260; 0940460 BC Ltd. v. Burnaby (City), 2020 BCCA 142 at paras. 36, 40–44. If there were any doubt about the matter, it is resolved in this case by s. 490(5) of the LGA which expressly pro......
-
Taylor v. Vancouver (City),
...public nature that they cannot be waived, lost, or vitiated by mere acquiescence: Langley at para. 12; 0940460 BC Ltd. v. Burnaby (City), 2020 BCCA 142 at para. 42 [Burnaby]; Corporation of the Township of Esquimalt v. Crosson, 2010 BCSC 1490 at para. 43 [Esquimalt]. Moreover, the fact that......