1010805 Alberta Ltd v. Sundial Growers Inc
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Nixon |
| Citation | 2024 ABKB 173 |
| Docket Number | 2201 14923 |
| Date | 25 March 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Woodlands (County) v. Whitecourt (Town)
...a question of law, and agreement between the parties cannot be determinative of the matter”); 1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc, 2024 ABKB 173, DB Nixon ACJ para [32] I’ll review the statutory framework for arbitration under Part 17.2 of the MGA and the implications of that framewor......
-
Lawrence v. Wood
...of our courts confirms that the “narrow view” has evolved into the preferred approach: 1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc, 2024 ABKB 173 at para 18, citing also Clark v Unterschultz, 2020 ABQB 338 at para 45; KBR Industrial Canada Co v Air Liquide Global E&C Solutions Canada LP, ......
-
Agyarko v. Smith
...9. Not all bad faith conduct is fundamental. See, e.g., Doucette v Giannoulis, 2006 NSSC 166; 1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc, 2024 ABKB 173. As a result, the defendants couldn’t unilaterally treat the APS as at an end. And, again, there’s no evidence that they accepted the plaint......
-
Quanta Canada Holdings II ULC v. Bremar Construction Ltd
...posed to an arbitration panel: Driscoll v Hautz, 2017 ABQB 168 at para 19; KBR at para 62; and 1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc, 2024 ABKB 173 at para 18. The appeal in the present case does not concern any questions of law that were specifically referred to the IV. Do the Grounds ......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Woodlands (County) v. Whitecourt (Town)
...a question of law, and agreement between the parties cannot be determinative of the matter”); 1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc, 2024 ABKB 173, DB Nixon ACJ para [32] I’ll review the statutory framework for arbitration under Part 17.2 of the MGA and the implications of that framewor......
-
Lawrence v. Wood
...of our courts confirms that the “narrow view” has evolved into the preferred approach: 1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc, 2024 ABKB 173 at para 18, citing also Clark v Unterschultz, 2020 ABQB 338 at para 45; KBR Industrial Canada Co v Air Liquide Global E&C Solutions Canada LP, ......
-
Agyarko v. Smith
...9. Not all bad faith conduct is fundamental. See, e.g., Doucette v Giannoulis, 2006 NSSC 166; 1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc, 2024 ABKB 173. As a result, the defendants couldn’t unilaterally treat the APS as at an end. And, again, there’s no evidence that they accepted the plaint......
-
Quanta Canada Holdings II ULC v. Bremar Construction Ltd
...posed to an arbitration panel: Driscoll v Hautz, 2017 ABQB 168 at para 19; KBR at para 62; and 1010805 Alberta Ltd v Sundial Growers Inc, 2024 ABKB 173 at para 18. The appeal in the present case does not concern any questions of law that were specifically referred to the IV. Do the Grounds ......
Get Started for Free
