1193652 B.C. Ltd. v. New Westminster (City),
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Madam Justice Dickson,The Honourable Mr. Justice Abrioux |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCCA 176 |
| Docket Number | 2021bcca176 |
| Date | 01 January 0001 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Citation | 2021 BCCA 176 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Edmonton (City of) Library Board v Edmonton (City of),
...of a provision must have regard to its text, context and purpose: Vavilov at paras 118-121; 1193652 B.C. Ltd. v New Westminster (City), 2021 BCCA 176 at para 64 [New VII. The Variance Power under s 687(3)(d) of the MGA A. Purpose of Alberta’s Planning Laws [31] The MGA sets out the statutor......
-
Pacific Wild Alliance v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development),
...However, 1120732 B.C. Ltd. v. Whistler (Resort Municipality), 2020 BCCA 101 and 1193652 B.C. Ltd. v. New Westminster (City), 2021 BCCA 176 [1193652 B.C. Ltd.], suggest that Vavilov may have changed the appropriate standard of review. Although both cases concerned the validity of a municipal......
2 cases
-
Edmonton (City of) Library Board v Edmonton (City of),
...of a provision must have regard to its text, context and purpose: Vavilov at paras 118-121; 1193652 B.C. Ltd. v New Westminster (City), 2021 BCCA 176 at para 64 [New VII. The Variance Power under s 687(3)(d) of the MGA A. Purpose of Alberta’s Planning Laws [31] The MGA sets out the statutor......
-
Pacific Wild Alliance v. British Columbia (Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development),
...However, 1120732 B.C. Ltd. v. Whistler (Resort Municipality), 2020 BCCA 101 and 1193652 B.C. Ltd. v. New Westminster (City), 2021 BCCA 176 [1193652 B.C. Ltd.], suggest that Vavilov may have changed the appropriate standard of review. Although both cases concerned the validity of a municipal......