407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), 2015 SCC 52

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne
Citation2015 SCC 52,[2015] 3 SCR 397
Docket Number35696
Subject MatterPRACTICE,CONSTITUTIONAL LAW,STATUTES,BANKRUPTCY
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date13 November 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • Alberta (Attorney General) v. Moloney, [2015] 3 SCR 327
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 13, 2015
    ...115 O.R. (3d) 33; R. v. White, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 417; 407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), 2015 SCC 52, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 397; Gorguis v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2011 SKQB 132, 372 Sask. R. 152, rev’d 2013 SKCA 32, 414 Sask. R. 5; Buchanan v. Superline Fue......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law in Canada. Cases, Materials, and Problems Part V
    • June 23, 2019
    ...excerpts have been included. Excerpts are marked in bold. 407 ETR Concession Co v Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy) , 2015 SCC 52, [2015] 3 SCR 397 .............................................................. xix, 79, 80 , 98, 100, 478 544553 BC Ltd v Sunshine Coast Mechanical Contrac......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Constitutional Law. Fifth Edition Conclusion
    • August 3, 2017
    ...206 O.A.C. 219, [2006] O.J. No. 70 (C.A.) ...................... 372 407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendant of Bankruptcy), [2015] 3 S.C.R. 397, 2015 SCC 52 ................................................................ 136 A & L Investments Ltd. v. Ontario (1997), 36 O.R. (3d) ......
  • The Constitution Act, 1867: Federalism and Judicial Power
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Constitutional Law. Fifth Edition The Framework and Institutions of Government
    • August 3, 2017
    ...(Attorney General) v. Moloney , [2015] 3 S.C.R. 327 [ Moloney ]; 407 ETR Concession Co. v Canada (Superintendant of Bankruptcy) , [2015] 3 S.C.R. 397; Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v. Lemare Lake Logging Ltd . , [2015] 3 S.C.R. 419. The Constitution Act, 1867 : Federalism and Judicial Pow......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Alberta (Attorney General) v. Moloney, [2015] 3 SCR 327
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 13, 2015
    ...115 O.R. (3d) 33; R. v. White, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 417; 407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), 2015 SCC 52, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 397; Gorguis v. Saskatchewan Government Insurance, 2011 SKQB 132, 372 Sask. R. 152, rev’d 2013 SKCA 32, 414 Sask. R. 5; Buchanan v. Superline Fue......
  • Romspen Investment Corporation v. Courtice Auto Wreckers Limited, 2017 ONCA 301
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • April 13, 2017
    ...J. in Moloney, which he echoed in the companion case 407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), 2015 SCC 52, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 397. At para. 18 of Moloney, Gascon J A conflict is said to arise in one of two situations, which form the two branches of the paramountcy test:......
  • Chartered Professional Accountants of Alberta v Neilson, 2018 ABQB 170
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 7, 2018
    ...of Canada did not mention it on that appeal or in the companion case of 407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy), [2015] 3 SCR 397, 2015 SCC 52. Moloney and ETR were concerned with debt collection schemes, not professional regulation. [40] Parliament subsequently enac......
  • Weddell (Bankrupt), Re, 2016 ABQB 248
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 3, 2016
    ...powers. [76] In the companion decisions of Moloney and 407 ETR Concession Co v Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy) , 2015 SCC 52, [2015] 3 SCR 397 the Supreme Court identified two ways in which provincial legislation can conflict with federal legislation and, as a result, be rendered inop......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law in Canada. Cases, Materials, and Problems Part V
    • June 23, 2019
    ...excerpts have been included. Excerpts are marked in bold. 407 ETR Concession Co v Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy) , 2015 SCC 52, [2015] 3 SCR 397 .............................................................. xix, 79, 80 , 98, 100, 478 544553 BC Ltd v Sunshine Coast Mechanical Contrac......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Constitutional Law. Fifth Edition Conclusion
    • August 3, 2017
    ...206 O.A.C. 219, [2006] O.J. No. 70 (C.A.) ...................... 372 407 ETR Concession Co. v. Canada (Superintendant of Bankruptcy), [2015] 3 S.C.R. 397, 2015 SCC 52 ................................................................ 136 A & L Investments Ltd. v. Ontario (1997), 36 O.R. (3d) ......
  • The Constitution Act, 1867: Federalism and Judicial Power
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Constitutional Law. Fifth Edition The Framework and Institutions of Government
    • August 3, 2017
    ...(Attorney General) v. Moloney , [2015] 3 S.C.R. 327 [ Moloney ]; 407 ETR Concession Co. v Canada (Superintendant of Bankruptcy) , [2015] 3 S.C.R. 397; Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v. Lemare Lake Logging Ltd . , [2015] 3 S.C.R. 419. The Constitution Act, 1867 : Federalism and Judicial Pow......
  • Constitutional Aspects and the Judicial and Administrative Structure of the Bankruptcy System
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law in Canada. Cases, Materials, and Problems Part I
    • June 23, 2019
    ...conlict which would have triggered the paramountcy rule. 407 ETR Concession Co v Canada (Superintendent of Bankruptcy) , 2015 SCC 52, [2015] 3 SCR 397 Gascon J (Abella, Rothstein, Cromwell, Moldaver, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ concurring) I. INTRODUCTION [1] Like its companion case, Alberta......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT