Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

5976511 Manitoba Ltd. et al. v. Taylor McCaffrey LLP et al., 2020 MBQB 48

Judgment Cited authorities 14 Cited in 2 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionManitoba
JudgeEDMOND
Citation2020 MBQB 48
Date10 March 2020
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
Docket NumberCI 13-01-85639
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Michif CFS v. S.A.S. and J.A.A.M., 2022 MBKB 176
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 9 September 2022
    ...evidence, to establish that there is a genuine issue requiring a trial (see 5976511 Manitoba Ltd. et al. v. Taylor McCaffrey LLP et al., 2020 MBQB 48, at para. [35]      In this case, summary judgment allows the Court to make the necessary findings of fact and allow......
  • Mirage Consulting Ltd. v. 5573344 Manitoba Ltd. et al., 2021 MBQB 186
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 16 August 2021
    ...a trial.   [17]      More recently, in 5976511 Manitoba Ltd. et al. v. Taylor McCaffrey LLP et al., 2020 MBQB 48 (“597”), this court found that “summary judgment rules must be interpreted broadly, favouring proportionality and fair access t......
2 cases
  • Michif CFS v. S.A.S. and J.A.A.M., 2022 MBKB 176
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 9 September 2022
    ...evidence, to establish that there is a genuine issue requiring a trial (see 5976511 Manitoba Ltd. et al. v. Taylor McCaffrey LLP et al., 2020 MBQB 48, at para. [35]      In this case, summary judgment allows the Court to make the necessary findings of fact and allow......
  • Mirage Consulting Ltd. v. 5573344 Manitoba Ltd. et al., 2021 MBQB 186
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • 16 August 2021
    ...a trial.   [17]      More recently, in 5976511 Manitoba Ltd. et al. v. Taylor McCaffrey LLP et al., 2020 MBQB 48 (“597”), this court found that “summary judgment rules must be interpreted broadly, favouring proportionality and fair access t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT