628356 SASKATCHEWAN LTD. v. WATER SECURITY AGENCY, 2018 SKQB 4
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | BARRINGTON-FOOTE J. |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 4 |
| Date | 03 January 2018 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | QBG 251 of 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
McLean v McLean, 2019 SKCA 15
...and the action dismissed or judgment entered accordingly. (footnotes omitted) (See also, 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4 at para 16, 78 CLR (4th) 53.) C. Did the Chambers judge err in striking the cause of action for intentional infliction of mental suffering c......
-
ROMANCHUK v. JEMI FIBRE CORP., 2018 SKQB 46
...application under Rule 7‑9(2)(a) was very recently summarized by Barrington‑Foote J. in 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4 [628356 Saskatchewan Ltd.], as follows: [12] The law relating to an application to strike a statement of claim on the ground specified in Rul......
-
JANICE ORTYNSKI AS POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR IRENE KIRKLAND-BIRD v. BIRD,
...the pleadings, unless the amendments could be struck pursuant to Rule 7-9(2): 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4, 78 CLR (4th) 53; Rekken v Saskatchewan (Health Region #1); 2015 SKCA 36, 384 DLR (4th) 174. In Boisvert v Milton (R......
-
POLSFUT v. SEMBALERUS, 2018 SKQB 137
...actual prejudice by this amendment to the plaintiff’s claim. As recently stated in 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4 at para 52, “actual prejudice” is defined as 52 As to the requirement that I must be satisfied that the defendant will not suffer actual prejudice......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
McLean v McLean, 2019 SKCA 15
...and the action dismissed or judgment entered accordingly. (footnotes omitted) (See also, 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4 at para 16, 78 CLR (4th) 53.) C. Did the Chambers judge err in striking the cause of action for intentional infliction of mental suffering c......
-
ROMANCHUK v. JEMI FIBRE CORP., 2018 SKQB 46
...application under Rule 7‑9(2)(a) was very recently summarized by Barrington‑Foote J. in 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4 [628356 Saskatchewan Ltd.], as follows: [12] The law relating to an application to strike a statement of claim on the ground specified in Rul......
-
JANICE ORTYNSKI AS POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR IRENE KIRKLAND-BIRD v. BIRD,
...the pleadings, unless the amendments could be struck pursuant to Rule 7-9(2): 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4, 78 CLR (4th) 53; Rekken v Saskatchewan (Health Region #1); 2015 SKCA 36, 384 DLR (4th) 174. In Boisvert v Milton (R......
-
POLSFUT v. SEMBALERUS, 2018 SKQB 137
...actual prejudice by this amendment to the plaintiff’s claim. As recently stated in 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4 at para 52, “actual prejudice” is defined as 52 As to the requirement that I must be satisfied that the defendant will not suffer actual prejudice......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Polsfut v Sembalerus, 2018 SKQB 137
...QB Rule 5-20 QB Rule 7-1 Tariff of Costs, Schedule 1 �B�, Column 2 Cases Considered: 628356 Saskatchewan Ltd. v Water Security Agency, 2018 SKQB 4, 287 ACWS (3d) 459 Boma Manufacturing Ltd. v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, [1996] 3 SCR 727, 140 DLR (4th) 463, 203 NR 321, [1997] 2 WWR 1......