6524443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City)

JurisdictionOntario
Judge Van Rensburg, Laforme,Huscroft
Date13 June 2017
Docket NumberC63101
Citation2017 ONCA 486
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 – 16, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 30, 2017
    ...to determining the legal validity of the city's by-law. He made no errors in upholding the bylaw. 6524443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONCA 486 [LaForme, van Rensburg and Huscroft JJ.A.] Counsel: R.G. Slaught and S. Rollwagen, for the appellant C.B. Kuehl and C.T. Shorey, for the res......
  • International Arbitration Comparative Guide
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 22, 2019
    ...from awards that are considered flawed - without an element of public interest (6524443 Canada Inc v Toronto (City), [2017] OJ No 3045, 2017 ONCA 486 (Ont CA); Costa v Costa, [2008] OJ No 930, 89 OR (3d) 670 (Ont SCJ)). Appeals on questions of fact or mixed fact and law are allowed only in ......
  • Popack v. Lipszyc
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 12, 2018
    ...of the statute to the circumstances of the case or the interpretation of an arbitration agreement: 6524443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONCA 486, 415 D.L.R. (4th) 475, at para. 11. [32]       The respondents contend that deference is owed to the applicat......
  • Wang v. Takhar
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 25, 2019
    ...is binding upon the parties and it sets the parameters for the arbitration. [37] I note that in 6524443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONCA 486, the court held that the arbitration agreement entered into by the parties prior to arbitration superseded the arbitration clause in the previ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 cases
  • Popack v. Lipszyc
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 12, 2018
    ...of the statute to the circumstances of the case or the interpretation of an arbitration agreement: 6524443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONCA 486, 415 D.L.R. (4th) 475, at para. 11. [32]       The respondents contend that deference is owed to the applicat......
  • Wang v. Takhar
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 25, 2019
    ...is binding upon the parties and it sets the parameters for the arbitration. [37] I note that in 6524443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONCA 486, the court held that the arbitration agreement entered into by the parties prior to arbitration superseded the arbitration clause in the previ......
  • Popack v. Lipszyc
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 12, 2018
    ...of the statute to the circumstances of the case or the interpretation of an arbitration agreement: 6524443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONCA 486, 415 D.L.R. (4th) 475, at para. 11. [32] The respondents contend that deference is owed to the application judge’s interpretation of the IC......
3 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 – 16, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 30, 2017
    ...to determining the legal validity of the city's by-law. He made no errors in upholding the bylaw. 6524443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONCA 486 [LaForme, van Rensburg and Huscroft JJ.A.] Counsel: R.G. Slaught and S. Rollwagen, for the appellant C.B. Kuehl and C.T. Shorey, for the res......
  • International Arbitration Comparative Guide
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 22, 2019
    ...from awards that are considered flawed - without an element of public interest (6524443 Canada Inc v Toronto (City), [2017] OJ No 3045, 2017 ONCA 486 (Ont CA); Costa v Costa, [2008] OJ No 930, 89 OR (3d) 670 (Ont SCJ)). Appeals on questions of fact or mixed fact and law are allowed only in ......
  • Want to Appeal a Commercial Arbitration Award? Make Sure You Secure Broad Rights of Appeal.
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 14, 2017
    ...narrow appellate rights set out in the Arbitration Act. A decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, 652443 Canada Inc. v. Toronto (City), 2017 ONCA 486, establishes the Court's unwillingness to get involved in appeals from arbitral awards. The case affirms that the policy underlying commerci......