6586856 Canada Inc. cob TFI Transport 22 L.P. v. Fick, 2021 FCA 2
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2021 FCA 2 |
| Date | 13 January 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Rutayisire v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...transparency. Each case must be judged on its own facts and specific circumstances: see e.g., 6586856 Canada Inc (Loomis Express) v Fick, 2021 FCA 2, at para 57; Alexander v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 762 (Norris J.), at para 67. [64] Here, the officer considered both how......
-
Chukwudi v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2023 FC 423
...simply because its reasoning exhibits a minor misstep” (Vavilov at para 100. See also 6586856 Canada Inc (Loomis Express) v Fick, 2021 FCA 2 at para 37). In this case, any error regarding the use of certain excerpts, as identified by Mr. Chukwudi’s counsel, is not sufficiently......
2 cases
-
Rutayisire v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...transparency. Each case must be judged on its own facts and specific circumstances: see e.g., 6586856 Canada Inc (Loomis Express) v Fick, 2021 FCA 2, at para 57; Alexander v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 762 (Norris J.), at para 67. [64] Here, the officer considered both how......
-
Chukwudi v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2023 FC 423
...simply because its reasoning exhibits a minor misstep” (Vavilov at para 100. See also 6586856 Canada Inc (Loomis Express) v Fick, 2021 FCA 2 at para 37). In this case, any error regarding the use of certain excerpts, as identified by Mr. Chukwudi’s counsel, is not sufficiently......