R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | Wagner C.J. and Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Brown and Martin JJ. |
Citation | 2019 SCC 34 |
Date | 31 May 2019 |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Docket Number | 37971 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
436 practice notes
-
R. v. Stairs, 2022 SCC 11
...SCC 49, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692. By Côté J. Referred to: R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 621; R. v. Pileggi, 2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; ......
-
B.J.T. v. J.D., 2022 SCC 24
...182; Mouvement laïque québécois v. Saguenay (City), 2015 SCC 16, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 3; The Queen v. Lupien, [1970] S.C.R. 263; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; Re Baby Duffell: Martin v. Duffell, [1950] S.C.R. 737; Hepton v. Maat, [1957] S.C.R. 606; Re Agar; McNeilly v. Agar, [1958]......
-
R. v. Charles, 2024 SCC 29
...(dissenting) R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; R. v. Youvarajah, 2013 SCC 41, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 720; R. v. Couture, 2007 SCC 28, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 517; R. v. Bradshaw, 20......
-
R v McColman,
...2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494; R. v. Paterson, 2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 202; R. v. Blake, 2010 ONCA 1, 251 C.C.C. (3d) 4; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; R. v. Lafrance, 2022 SCC 32; R. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2013 SCC 16, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Vu, 2013 SCC 60, [2......
Request a trial to view additional results
374 cases
-
R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33
...ONCA 180, 409 D.L.R. (4th) 691; R. v. Barton, 2019 SCC 33, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 579; R. v. Goldfinch, 2019 SCC 38, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; R. v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11; R. v. C.P., 2021 SCC 19; Beamish v. Beamish (1861), 9 H.L.C. 274; Stuart v. Bank of Montreal......
-
R. v. Chouhan, 2021 SCC 26
...[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369; R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484; Peart v. Peel Regional Police Services (2006), 43 C.R. (6th) 175; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34; R. v. Biddle, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 761; R. v. Lines, [1993] O.J. No. 3284; R. v. Gayle (2001), 54 O.R. (3d) 36; R. v. Khan, 2001 SCC 86, [2001] 3 S.......
-
R. v. White, 2022 NSCA 61
...2011 SCC 46; R. v. Simon, 2020 NSCA 25; R. v. Vu, 2013 SCC 60; R. v. McGuffie, 2016 ONCA 365; R. v. Campbell, 2018 NSCA 42; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34; R. v. Tim, 2022 SCC 12; R. v. Belnavis, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 341; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34; R. v. Loewen, 2011 SCC 21; R. v. Chaisson, 2006 SCC 11......
-
R. v. Stairs, 2022 SCC 11
...SCC 49, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692. By Côté J. Referred to: R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 621; R. v. Pileggi, 2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (APRIL 27 – MAY 1)
...2013 SCC 49, R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50, R. v. Wong, 2017 BCSC 306, R. v. A.M., 2008 SCC 19, R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, R. v. Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, R. v. Plant, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 281, R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265, R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, R. v. Flintroy, 2019......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 11 ' 15, 2020)
...Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 59, R. v. Mian, 2014 SCC 54, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 689, R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 3, R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, R. v. Kitaitchik (2002), 166 C.C.C. (3d) 14 (Ont. C.A.), CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada(Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, R. v.......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
...2013 SCC 49, R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50, R. v. Wong, 2017 BCSC 306, R. v. A.M., 2008 SCC 19, R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, R. v. Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, R. v. Plant, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 281, R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265, R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, R. v. Flintroy, 2019......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 19 - 23, 2019)
...Arbitrary Detention, Racial Profiling, Criminal Code, s. 279.01(1), s. 286.3(1), s. 286.4, R. v Jabarianha, 2001 SCC 7516, R. v Le, 2019 SCC 34, Peart v Peel Regional Police Services Board (2006), 43 CR (6th) 175 (Ont. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to th......
Request a trial to view additional results
53 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Le, R v , 2006 BCCA 463 .......................................................414 Le, R v , 2019 SCC 34 ...............................................250, 493, 523-25 Leblanc, R v , 2021 QCCA 1283 ................................................. 457 Leboutillier c R , 2017 QCCS 5641 , af......
-
Judicial Notice
...61-62. 40 For more on judicial Internet research, see Section III.D. 41 R v Whittaker , 2001 ABQB 873. 42 Ibid at para 25. 43 R v Le , 2019 SCC 34. Copyright © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 3 Judicial Notice 57 government of Ontario and written by a Court ......
-
Sources of Criminal Procedure
...Section 9 Jurisprudence” (2009) 66 Criminal Reports (6th) 75. 93 See the discussion of this issue in Chapter 5, Section C(1). 94 R v Le , 2019 SCC 34. Sources of Criminal Procedure 25 first entered the backyard, or was it not until they began asking the accused focused questions? The dissen......
-
Search and Seizure
...that demeans his or her dignity, is more serious than one that does not.” 25 R v Cole , 2012 SCC 53 at para 9 [ Cole ]. See also R v Le , 2019 SCC 34 [ Le ] at para 136: “it is possible for an individual to have a diminished or qualified reasonable expectation of privacy while still retaini......
Request a trial to view additional results