R. v. Le
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner C.J. and Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Brown and Martin JJ. |
| Citation | 2019 SCC 34 |
| Docket Number | 37971 |
| Date | 31 May 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
645 practice notes
-
Howe v. Rees
...effective steps taken by the Society to address the systemic discrimination issue raised by Mr. Howe; (iii) Hypervigilance; (iv) R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34 2. Did the Panel err in law or act in a procedurally unfair manner by allowing Mr. Murray to remain on the Panel; 3. Did the Panel err in la......
-
B.J.T. v. J.D.
...182; Mouvement laïque québécois v. Saguenay (City), 2015 SCC 16, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 3; The Queen v. Lupien, [1970] S.C.R. 263; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; Re Baby Duffell: Martin v. Duffell, [1950] S.C.R. 737; Hepton v. Maat, [1957] S.C.R. 606; Re Agar; McNeilly v. Agar, [1958]......
-
R. v. Stairs
...SCC 49, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692. By Côté J. Referred to: R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 621; R. v. Pileggi, 2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; ......
-
R v Badu
...of the accused; and (3) society’s interest in the adjudication of the case on the merits: R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 at para 71; R v Le, 2019 SCC 34 at para 141. The ultimate question is whether admitting the evidence, “would bring the administration of justice into disrepute”. [9] Applying the......
Get Started for Free
585 cases
-
Howe v. Rees
...effective steps taken by the Society to address the systemic discrimination issue raised by Mr. Howe; (iii) Hypervigilance; (iv) R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34 2. Did the Panel err in law or act in a procedurally unfair manner by allowing Mr. Murray to remain on the Panel; 3. Did the Panel err in la......
-
B.J.T. v. J.D.
...182; Mouvement laïque québécois v. Saguenay (City), 2015 SCC 16, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 3; The Queen v. Lupien, [1970] S.C.R. 263; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; Re Baby Duffell: Martin v. Duffell, [1950] S.C.R. 737; Hepton v. Maat, [1957] S.C.R. 606; Re Agar; McNeilly v. Agar, [1958]......
-
R. v. Stairs
...SCC 49, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 456; R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 353; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692. By Côté J. Referred to: R. v. Fearon, 2014 SCC 77, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 621; R. v. Pileggi, 2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (3d) 561; ......
-
R v Badu
...of the accused; and (3) society’s interest in the adjudication of the case on the merits: R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 at para 71; R v Le, 2019 SCC 34 at para 141. The ultimate question is whether admitting the evidence, “would bring the administration of justice into disrepute”. [9] Applying the......
Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 11 ' 15, 2020)
...Mann, 2004 SCC 52, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 59, R. v. Mian, 2014 SCC 54, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 689, R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 3, R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, R. v. Kitaitchik (2002), 166 C.C.C. (3d) 14 (Ont. C.A.), CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada(Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, R. v.......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
...2013 SCC 49, R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50, R. v. Wong, 2017 BCSC 306, R. v. A.M., 2008 SCC 19, R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, R. v. Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, R. v. Plant, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 281, R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265, R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, R. v. Flintroy, 2019......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 19 - 23, 2019)
...Arbitrary Detention, Racial Profiling, Criminal Code, s. 279.01(1), s. 286.3(1), s. 286.4, R. v Jabarianha, 2001 SCC 7516, R. v Le, 2019 SCC 34, Peart v Peel Regional Police Services Board (2006), 43 CR (6th) 175 (Ont. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to th......
-
Racial Profiling And Entrapment: Evidentiary Considerations Before Proceeding With An Investigation
...as the detainee's sex, colour, age, ethic origin or sexual orientation. The Court reiterated the Supreme Court's decision in R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34 that a detention based on racial profiling is arbitrary as it is not based on reasonable suspicion, and that racial profiling is also relevant w......
Get Started for Free
53 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Le, R v , 2006 BCCA 463 .......................................................414 Le, R v , 2019 SCC 34 ...............................................250, 493, 523-25 Leblanc, R v , 2021 QCCA 1283 ................................................. 457 Leboutillier c R , 2017 QCCS 5641 , af......
-
Table of cases
...R v Layton, [2009] 2 SCR 540 ............................................................................ 685 R v Le, 2019 SCC 34 ....................................................466, 467, 488, 490, 494, 501 R v Leblanc, 2018 JQ No 12018 (CA) ...................................................
-
Table of Cases
...244 Lawson , R v , [1973] OJ No 1333 (QL), 22 CRNS 215 (PC) .......................... 200 Le , R v , 2019 SCC 34 ....................... 1, 10, 24, 27, 35, 39-40, 44, 47-59, 61, 66, 75, 97, 108, 110-12, 119-20, 126, 156, 195, 243, 276 Le (TD) , R v , 2011 MBCA 83 ................................
-
Judicial Notice
...61-62. 40 For more on judicial Internet research, see Section III.D. 41 R v Whittaker , 2001 ABQB 873. 42 Ibid at para 25. 43 R v Le , 2019 SCC 34. Copyright © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 3 Judicial Notice 57 government of Ontario and written by a Court ......
Get Started for Free
