A.A. v. Z.G., 2020 ONCA 192
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Tulloch, Benotto and Jamal JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 192 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | C67193 |
| Date | 09 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Matrimonial Property Rights
...on equalization claims, see Green v Green, 2013 ONSC 7265; Kinsella v Mills, 2017 ONSC 7093; Re Galeano, 2019 ONSC 4984; AA v ZG, 2020 ONCA 192; Johnston v Johnston, 2020 ONSC 6515; Rusinek & Associates Inc v Arachchilage, 2021 ONCA 112; see also Robert A “Bankruptcy Problems in Family Law”......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 9 March 13, 2020)
...everyone the best of health. John Polyzogopoulos Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.593.2953 Email TABLE OF CONTENTS Civil Decisions A.A. v. Z.G. , 2020 ONCA 192 Keywords: Family Law, functus officio, Family Law Rules, Rule 15, Spousal Support, Bankruptcy Miaskowski v. MacIntyre , 2020 ONCA 178 Keywor......
-
Table of Cases
...v M(RM) 392, 394 A(JE) v S(A) 683 A(LJ) v A(L) 694 AA v GG 595 AA v RR 175 AA v SNA (2007 BCCA) 656 AA v SNA (2009 BCSC) 656 AA v ZG, 2020 ONCA 192 745 AAA v KN 228, 229, 512, 665 AAAM v British Columbia (Children and Family Development) 682 AAC v MAB 404 Aalbers v Aalbers 316, 325, 476 AAM......
-
Weber v. Weber,
...to the costs award to take into account that party’s lack of success on certain issues in the proceeding (Beaver; A.A. v. Z.G., 2020 ONCA 192 (C.A.), at para. 28). The nature and extent of the adjustments will be a matter of discretion and will depend in part on the nature, importance and c......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Weber v. Weber,
...to the costs award to take into account that party’s lack of success on certain issues in the proceeding (Beaver; A.A. v. Z.G., 2020 ONCA 192 (C.A.), at para. 28). The nature and extent of the adjustments will be a matter of discretion and will depend in part on the nature, importance and c......
-
Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 5561
...orders are appropriately made (albeit stating that to be particularly the case with self-represented parties). In A.A. v. Z.G., 2020 ONCA 192, the appeal court stated that “Rule 2 specifically grants judges some procedural freedom to resolve family law disputes fairly and expeditiously. ” [......
-
Duarte v. Van Camp, 2020 ONSC 4155
...conference to make such an order. [16] In A.A. v. Z.G., 2020 ONCA 192, at para.24: the Ontario Court of Appeal stated that: “Rule 2 specifically grants judges some procedural freedom to resolve family law dispute......
-
Medu v. Medu, 2020 ONSC 3696
...with, if not required by, the primary objective identified in Rule 2(2) of Family Law Rules. The Ontario Court of Appeal in A.A. v. Z.G., 2020 ONCA 192 recently described “dealing with cases justly” to mean “ensuring that the procedure is fair to all parties, savin......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 9 March 13, 2020)
...everyone the best of health. John Polyzogopoulos Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.593.2953 Email TABLE OF CONTENTS Civil Decisions A.A. v. Z.G. , 2020 ONCA 192 Keywords: Family Law, functus officio, Family Law Rules, Rule 15, Spousal Support, Bankruptcy Miaskowski v. MacIntyre , 2020 ONCA 178 Keywor......
2 books & journal articles
-
Matrimonial Property Rights
...on equalization claims, see Green v Green, 2013 ONSC 7265; Kinsella v Mills, 2017 ONSC 7093; Re Galeano, 2019 ONSC 4984; AA v ZG, 2020 ONCA 192; Johnston v Johnston, 2020 ONSC 6515; Rusinek & Associates Inc v Arachchilage, 2021 ONCA 112; see also Robert A “Bankruptcy Problems in Family Law”......
-
Table of Cases
...v M(RM) 392, 394 A(JE) v S(A) 683 A(LJ) v A(L) 694 AA v GG 595 AA v RR 175 AA v SNA (2007 BCCA) 656 AA v SNA (2009 BCSC) 656 AA v ZG, 2020 ONCA 192 745 AAA v KN 228, 229, 512, 665 AAAM v British Columbia (Children and Family Development) 682 AAC v MAB 404 Aalbers v Aalbers 316, 325, 476 AAM......