Achtem v. Boese
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Huscroft, Nordheimer and Harvison Young JJ.A. |
| Docket Number | C68744 |
| Date | 04 May 2021 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 284 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 3-7, 2021)
...an enjoyable weekend. John Polyzogopoulos Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.593.2953 Email Table of Contents Civil Decisions Achtem v. Boese, 2021 ONCA 284 Keywords: Debtor-Creditor, Civil Procedure, Judgments, Enforcement, Writs of Seizure and Sale, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60.07(2), Rule 60.0......
-
Robert R NG v Hao Ji Tang, formerly known as JOSEPH HOKAI TANG,
...the court may conclude that the plaintiff has not waived its rights or acquiesced in non-payment of the judgment. See Achtem v Boese, 2021 ONCA 284 at paras 4, 9, citing Royal Bank of Canada v Correia, 2006 CanLII 26976 (ONSC) at para 6; Bank of Montreal v Adams, 2024 ONSC 2773 at para 26 T......
-
MCAP Service Corp. v. Sivabalan,
...have elapsed from the date of the original order. In such a motion, as the Court of Appeal for Ontario stated in Achtem v. Boese, 2021 ONCA 284, “it would be a rare case where the party seeking leave is unable to meet the test by sufficiently explaining the delay” (citin......
-
The Bank of Nova Scotia v Arnold,
...and filed no responding material. 7 The evidentiary threshold of providing an explanation for the delay is a low one. Achtem v. Boese, 2021 ONCA 284 at para 8 Delay is but one factor to be considered in determining whether leave under rule 60.07(2) should be granted. It is relevant to the i......
3 cases
-
Robert R NG v Hao Ji Tang, formerly known as JOSEPH HOKAI TANG
...the court may conclude that the plaintiff has not waived its rights or acquiesced in non-payment of the judgment. See Achtem v Boese, 2021 ONCA 284 at paras 4, 9, citing Royal Bank of Canada v Correia, 2006 CanLII 26976 (ONSC) at para 6; Bank of Montreal v Adams, 2024 ONSC 2773 at para 26 T......
-
MCAP Service Corp. v. Sivabalan
...have elapsed from the date of the original order.  In such a motion, as the Court of Appeal for Ontario stated in Achtem v. Boese, 2021 ONCA 284, “it would be a rare case where the party seeking leave is unable to meet the test by sufficiently explaining the delay” (citin......
-
The Bank of Nova Scotia v Arnold
...and filed no responding material. 7 The evidentiary threshold of providing an explanation for the delay is a low one. Achtem v. Boese, 2021 ONCA 284 at para 8 Delay is but one factor to be considered in determining whether leave under rule 60.07(2) should be granted. It is relevant to the i......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 3-7, 2021)
...an enjoyable weekend. John Polyzogopoulos Blaney McMurtry LLP 416.593.2953 Email Table of Contents Civil Decisions Achtem v. Boese, 2021 ONCA 284 Keywords: Debtor-Creditor, Civil Procedure, Judgments, Enforcement, Writs of Seizure and Sale, Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60.07(2), Rule 60.0......