Adam v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeKoehnen J.
Date10 December 2019
Docket NumberCV-11-440375
Citation2019 ONSC 7066
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 22, 2021
    ...On appeal from the judgment of Justice Markus Koehnen of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 10, 2019, with reasons reported at 2019 ONSC 7066. Brown OVERVIEW [1]          Amina Adam was the daughter of the appellants, May Hyacenth Abud......
  • Vaccine Injury Developments Reaffirm That Proving Causation Remains A High Bar
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 21, 2021
    ...the relative strengths of such claims. Footnotes Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit, 2021 ONCA 828 ("Appeal Decision"). Adam v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., 2019 ONSC 7066 ("Trial Trial Decision, paras. 78-79. Trial Decision, para. 64. Trial Decision, para. 116. Appeal Decision, paras. 55, 57. Defined as "a s......
  • Pivoting Production To Address COVID-19 Shortages – What Manufacturers And Distributors Need To Know
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 2, 2020
    ...- use of US FDA guidance and Canadian requirements for authorization under the Interim Order. 10 Vaccines and treatments for COVID-19. 11 2019 ONSC 7066. 12 Ibid., para. 13 Ibid., para 59. The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned ag......
  • Pivoting Production To Address COVID-19 Shortages ' What Manufacturers And Distributors Need To Know
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 2, 2020
    ...- use of US FDA guidance and Canadian requirements for authorization under the Interim Order. 10 Vaccines and treatments for COVID-19. 11 2019 ONSC 7066. 12 Ibid., para. 13 Ibid., para 59. The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned ag......
  • Get Started for Free
2 cases
  • Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 22, 2021
    ...On appeal from the judgment of Justice Markus Koehnen of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 10, 2019, with reasons reported at 2019 ONSC 7066. Brown OVERVIEW [1]          Amina Adam was the daughter of the appellants, May Hyacenth Abud......
  • Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 13, 2021
    ...On appeal from the judgment of Justice Markus Koehnen of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 10, 2019, with reasons reported at 2019 ONSC 7066. COSTS [1]          We have reviewed the cost submissions filed by the parties. We do not acc......
4 firm's commentaries