Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Brown, Roberts and Zarnett JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 828 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 828 |
| Docket Number | C67828 |
| Date | 22 November 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Ding v Canam Super Vacation Inc.
...Hollis at para. 20; Buchan v. Ortho Pharmaceutical (Canada) Ltd. (1986), 25 D.L.R. (4th) 658 at 667 (C.A.); Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit, 2021 ONCA 828 at para. 127 As consumers have far less knowledge than manufacturers concerning the dangers inherent in the use of their products, the duty to wa......
-
Listovets v AstraZeneca Canada Inc.
...use that are known or ought reasonably to be known. See Hollis v Dow Corning Corp., [1995] 4 SCR 634, at para 20; Adam v Ledesma-Cadhit, 2021 ONCA 828, at para 32 The “first step” in every product liability case alleging a failure to warn is the determination of whether the product is defec......
-
Fan v Cute Pet Resort Inc.
...The Plaintiff will have 2 weeks thereafter to provide a response. Justice C.F. de Sa Released: January 9, 2025. 1 Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit, 2021 ONCA 828, at para. 2 Butera v. Chown, Cairns LLP, 2017 ONCA 783 (CanLII); Nazir v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2024 ONSC 5394. 57 I will receiv......
5 cases
-
Price v. H. Lundbeck A/S
...congenital malformation, requiring proof of all aspects of the case, starting with general causation. [171] In Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit, 2021 ONCA 828, leave to appeal refused, [2022] S.C.C.A. No. 13, Brown J.A. reviewed the applicable case law and held that the duty to warn arises with respe......
-
Ding v Canam Super Vacation Inc.
...Hollis at para. 20; Buchan v. Ortho Pharmaceutical (Canada) Ltd. (1986), 25 D.L.R. (4th) 658 at 667 (C.A.); Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit, 2021 ONCA 828 at para. 127 As consumers have far less knowledge than manufacturers concerning the dangers inherent in the use of their products, the duty to wa......
-
Price v. Lundbeck
...in view of the leading case of Hollis v. Dow Corning Corp., [1995] 4 S.C.R. 634 and other authorities including Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit, 2021 ONCA 828, leave to appeal refused, [2022] S.C.C.A. No. 13. He followed Hollis, under which a duty to warn must arise from specific risks, which must a......
-
Burr v. Tecumseh
...losses to either Venmar or the plaintiffs. Did Venmar take Sufficient Steps to Notify Customers? Overview [406] Adam v. Ledesma-Cadhit, 2021 ONCA 828, recently summarized the principles of warnings in the area of medical products at paras. 19 – 20. I take those principles to apply in this c......
Get Started for Free
