Agribrands Purina v. Kasamekas, [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 166 (SC)

JudgeM.G. Quigley, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 06, 2010
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2010] O.T.C. Uned. 166 (SC);[2010] O.T.C. Uned. 166;2010 ONSC 166
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...[1990] 1 AC 109, [1988] 3 All ER 545 (HL) .........................................297, 302 Agribrands Purina Canada Inc v Kasamekas, 2010 ONSC 166, var’d on other grounds, 2011 ONCA 460 ............ 30, 42, 399 Alberta v Arnold, (1970), [1971] SCR 209, 14 DLR (3d) 574, 75 WWR 201 ...............
  • Abbott and Haliburton Co. Ltd. et al. v. WBLI Chartered Accountants, (2015) 360 N.S.R.(2d) 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 7, 2014
    ...Inc. (2014), 757 F.3d 1286 (Fed. Cir.), refd to. [para. 44]. Agribrands Purina Canada Inc. v. Kasamekas et al., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 166; 2010 ONSC 166, refd to. [para. International Hi-Tech Industries Inc. v. FANUC Robotics Canada Ltd. et al., [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. B10; 2006 BCSC 2011, refd......
  • Abbott and Haliburton Co. Ltd. et al. v. WBLI Chartered Accountants, (2015) 470 N.R. 324 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 7, 2014
    ...Inc. ( 2014), 757 F.3d 1286 (Fed. Cir.), refd to. [para. 44]. Agribrands Purina Canada Inc. v. Kasamekas et al., [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 166; 2010 ONSC 166, refd to. [para. International Hi-Tech Industries Inc. v. FANUC Robotics Canada Ltd. et al., [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. B10; 2006 BCSC 2011, ref......
  • Remoteness of Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...issue of fairness and policy. To understand and apply the rule of remoteness, therefore, 25 In Agribrands Purina Canada Inc v Kasamekas , 2010 ONSC 166, var’d on other grounds 2011 ONCA 460, the court held that the loss of future profits is compensable despite the uncertainty of the calcula......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...[1990] 1 AC 109, [1988] 3 All ER 545 (HL) .........................................297, 302 Agribrands Purina Canada Inc v Kasamekas, 2010 ONSC 166, var’d on other grounds, 2011 ONCA 460 ............ 30, 42, 399 Alberta v Arnold, (1970), [1971] SCR 209, 14 DLR (3d) 574, 75 WWR 201 ...............
  • Remoteness of Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...issue of fairness and policy. To understand and apply the rule of remoteness, therefore, 25 In Agribrands Purina Canada Inc v Kasamekas , 2010 ONSC 166, var’d on other grounds 2011 ONCA 460, the court held that the loss of future profits is compensable despite the uncertainty of the calcula......
  • A RIGHT TO CHOOSE: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND DEFENCE OF THE MINIMUM PERFORMANCE PRINCIPLE.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 77 No. 2, March 2019
    • March 22, 2019
    ...[Bhasin] (94) Ibid. (95) Agribrands Purina, supra note 89 at para 50. (96) Supra note 7. (97) Agribrands Purina Canada Inc v Kasamekas, 2010 ONSC 166 at paras 100, (98) Agribrands Purina, supra note 89; Open Window SCC, supra note 7. (99) Agribrands Purina, supra note 89. (100) Ibid at para......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT